Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > quant-ph > arXiv:1606.02197v2

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Quantum Physics

arXiv:1606.02197v2 (quant-ph)
[Submitted on 7 Jun 2016 (v1), revised 15 Jun 2016 (this version, v2), latest version 9 Jan 2017 (v4)]

Title:Two-qubit correlations revisited: average mutual information, relevant (and useful) observables and an application to remote state preparation

Authors:Paolo Giorda, Michele Allegra
View a PDF of the paper titled Two-qubit correlations revisited: average mutual information, relevant (and useful) observables and an application to remote state preparation, by Paolo Giorda and 1 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Understanding how correlations can be used for quantum communication protocols is a central goal of quantum information science. While many authors have linked global measures of correlations such as entanglement or discord to the performance of specific protocols, in general the protocols may require only on correlations between specific observables. Here, we introduce a pairwise measure of correlations between local observables, based on the classical mutual information, and show how it can be used to classify the quantum states and assess the role of correlations in specific protocols in a standard way. We exemplify our approach in a two-qubit scenario. We first focus on states with maximally mixed marginals (MMMS) and show that pairwise correlations between local observables are complementary to the coherence of the product bases they define, and that the purity and the symmetry of the states determines the average correlations. Next, we address the role of correlations in the remote state preparation protocol (RSP). One can introduce a proper figure-of-merit for RSP that depends only on a subset of relevant observables. While for MMMS the corresponding relevant correlations are always useful, i.e., they can be fruitfully used for RSP, for non-MMMS only a subset of the relevant correlations has this feature. In both cases, one can define a gain function that quantifies the benefit of using the useful correlations, which turns out to coincide with the average correlations between the useful observables. The gain provides a measure of correlations tied to the specific protocol and one can show that purity and symmetry are the resources that determine the overall performance. Optimizing the protocol means maximizing the useful correlations and thus minimizing the corresponding coherence. The scheme we propose can be straightforwardly extended to other communication protocols.
Comments: 12 pages + 1 page appendix, 4 figures
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:1606.02197 [quant-ph]
  (or arXiv:1606.02197v2 [quant-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1606.02197
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Michele Allegra [view email]
[v1] Tue, 7 Jun 2016 16:13:30 UTC (224 KB)
[v2] Wed, 15 Jun 2016 20:23:46 UTC (224 KB)
[v3] Mon, 5 Dec 2016 15:18:16 UTC (541 KB)
[v4] Mon, 9 Jan 2017 19:50:51 UTC (541 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Two-qubit correlations revisited: average mutual information, relevant (and useful) observables and an application to remote state preparation, by Paolo Giorda and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
quant-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2016-06

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack