Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1605.08278

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Software Engineering

arXiv:1605.08278 (cs)
[Submitted on 26 May 2016 (v1), last revised 20 Mar 2017 (this version, v4)]

Title:Should We Learn Probabilistic Models for Model Checking? A New Approach and An Empirical Study

Authors:Jingyi Wang, Jun Sun, Qixia Yuan, Jun Pang
View a PDF of the paper titled Should We Learn Probabilistic Models for Model Checking? A New Approach and An Empirical Study, by Jingyi Wang and Jun Sun and Qixia Yuan and Jun Pang
View PDF
Abstract:Many automated system analysis techniques (e.g., model checking, model-based testing) rely on first obtaining a model of the system under analysis. System modeling is often done manually, which is often considered as a hindrance to adopt model-based system analysis and development techniques. To overcome this problem, researchers have proposed to automatically "learn" models based on sample system executions and shown that the learned models can be useful sometimes. There are however many questions to be answered. For instance, how much shall we generalize from the observed samples and how fast would learning converge? Or, would the analysis result based on the learned model be more accurate than the estimation we could have obtained by sampling many system executions within the same amount of time? In this work, we investigate existing algorithms for learning probabilistic models for model checking, propose an evolution-based approach for better controlling the degree of generalization and conduct an empirical study in order to answer the questions. One of our findings is that the effectiveness of learning may sometimes be limited.
Comments: 15 pages, plus 2 reference pages, accepted by FASE 2017 in ETAPS
Subjects: Software Engineering (cs.SE)
Cite as: arXiv:1605.08278 [cs.SE]
  (or arXiv:1605.08278v4 [cs.SE] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1605.08278
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54494-5_1
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Jingyi Wang [view email]
[v1] Thu, 26 May 2016 13:51:40 UTC (562 KB)
[v2] Thu, 20 Oct 2016 11:51:53 UTC (2,084 KB)
[v3] Fri, 20 Jan 2017 02:12:35 UTC (800 KB)
[v4] Mon, 20 Mar 2017 09:30:56 UTC (1,598 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Should We Learn Probabilistic Models for Model Checking? A New Approach and An Empirical Study, by Jingyi Wang and Jun Sun and Qixia Yuan and Jun Pang
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.SE
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2016-05
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Jingyi Wang
Jun Sun
Qixia Yuan
Jun Pang
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack