Title:The Friendship Paradox and Systematic Biases in Perceptions and Social Norms

Abstract:The "friendship paradox" (Feld 1991) is the structural implication of networks that, on average, peoples' friends have strictly more friends than the average person in a network. In particular, the number of people who observe a given person is proportional to the number of connections that the person has. This can distort perceptions of norms and behavior if more popular people in a society behave differently from less popular people. As I show here there are two things that drive people with more friends to behave differently from people with fewer friends. The first is that in any setting with strategic complementarities, people with more friends are exposed to greater interaction and influence. The second is that people who benefit more from a given activity will tend to form more relationships as they benefit more from the complementarities. These two effects lead people with more friends to choose more extreme actions, which in turn feeds back via the the friendship paradox to increase overall perceptions of behavior and then via complementarities to amplify average behavior. These theoretical results are consistent with the multitude of studies finding that students (from middle school through university) consistently overestimate peer consumption of alcohol, cigarettes, and drugs. This in turn amplifies students' own behaviors, and can help explain problems with adolescent abuse of drugs and alcohol, as well as other behaviors. I also discuss how these results change in cases of strategic substitutes, where individuals overestimate free-riding by peers.