Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > physics > arXiv:1605.00590

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Physics > Computational Physics

arXiv:1605.00590 (physics)
[Submitted on 2 May 2016]

Title:Performance of the finite volume method in solving regularised Bingham flows: inertia effects in the lid-driven cavity flow

Authors:Alexandros Syrakos, Georgios C. Georgiou, Andreas N. Alexandrou
View a PDF of the paper titled Performance of the finite volume method in solving regularised Bingham flows: inertia effects in the lid-driven cavity flow, by Alexandros Syrakos and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:We extend our recent work on the creeping flow of a Bingham fluid in a lid-driven cavity, to the study of inertial effects, using a finite volume method and the Papanastasiou regularisation of the Bingham constitutive model [J. Rheology 31 (1987) 385-404]. The finite volume method used belongs to a very popular class of methods for solving Newtonian flow problems, which use the SIMPLE algorithm to solve the discretised set of equations, and have matured over the years. By regularising the Bingham constitutive equation it is easy to extend such a solver to Bingham flows since all that this requires is to modify the viscosity function. This is a tempting approach, since it requires minimum programming effort and makes available all the existing features of the mature finite volume solver. On the other hand, regularisation introduces a parameter which controls the error in addition to the grid spacing, and makes it difficult to locate the yield surfaces. Furthermore, the equations become stiffer and more difficult to solve, while the discontinuity at the yield surfaces causes large truncation errors. The present work attempts to investigate the strengths and weaknesses of such a method by applying it to the lid-driven cavity problem for a range of Bingham and Reynolds numbers (up to 100 and 5000 respectively). By employing techniques such as multigrid, local grid refinement, and an extrapolation procedure to reduce the effect of the regularisation parameter on the calculation of the yield surfaces (Liu et al. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 102 (2002) 179-191), satisfactory results are obtained, although the weaknesses of the method become more noticeable as the Bingham number is increased.
Subjects: Computational Physics (physics.comp-ph); Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science (cs.CE); Fluid Dynamics (physics.flu-dyn)
Cite as: arXiv:1605.00590 [physics.comp-ph]
  (or arXiv:1605.00590v1 [physics.comp-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1605.00590
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics 208-209 (2014) 88-107
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnnfm.2014.03.004
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Alexandros Syrakos [view email]
[v1] Mon, 2 May 2016 18:09:41 UTC (5,075 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Performance of the finite volume method in solving regularised Bingham flows: inertia effects in the lid-driven cavity flow, by Alexandros Syrakos and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
physics.comp-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2016-05
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CE
physics
physics.flu-dyn

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack