Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > physics > arXiv:1601.08091

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Physics > Fluid Dynamics

arXiv:1601.08091 (physics)
[Submitted on 29 Jan 2016]

Title:On the validity of tidal turbine array configurations obtained from steady-state adjoint optimisation

Authors:Christian T. Jacobs, Matthew D. Piggott, Stephan C. Kramer, Simon W. Funke
View a PDF of the paper titled On the validity of tidal turbine array configurations obtained from steady-state adjoint optimisation, by Christian T. Jacobs and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Extracting the optimal amount of power from an array of tidal turbines requires an intricate understanding of tidal dynamics and the effects of turbine placement on the local and regional scale flow. Numerical models have contributed significantly towards this understanding, and more recently, adjoint-based modelling has been employed to optimise the positioning of the turbines in an array in an automated way and improve on simple, regular man-made configurations. Adjoint-based optimisation of high-resolution and ideally 3D transient models is generally a very computationally expensive problem. As a result, existing work on the adjoint optimisation of tidal turbine placement has been mostly limited to steady-state simulations in which very high, non-physical values of the background viscosity are required to ensure that a steady-state solution exists. However, such compromises may affect the reliability of the modelled turbines, their wakes and interactions, and thus bring into question the validity of the computed optimal turbine positions. This work considers a suite of idealised simulations of flow past tidal turbine arrays in a 2D channel. It compares four regular array configurations, detailed by Divett et al. (2013), with the configuration found through adjoint optimisation in a steady-state, high-viscosity setup. The optimised configuration produces considerably more power. The same configurations are then used to produce a suite of transient simulations that do not use constant high-viscosity, and instead use large eddy simulation (LES) to parameterise the resulting turbulent structures. It is shown that the LES simulations produce less power than that predicted by the constant high-viscosity runs. Nevertheless, they still follow the same trends in the power curve throughout time, with optimised layouts continuing to perform significantly better than simplified configurations.
Comments: Conference paper comprising 15 pages and 13 figures. Submitted to the Proceedings of the ECCOMAS Congress 2016 (VII European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering), held in Crete, Greece on 5-10 June 2016
Subjects: Fluid Dynamics (physics.flu-dyn); Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science (cs.CE); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
Cite as: arXiv:1601.08091 [physics.flu-dyn]
  (or arXiv:1601.08091v1 [physics.flu-dyn] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1601.08091
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Christian Jacobs [view email]
[v1] Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:15:47 UTC (2,037 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled On the validity of tidal turbine array configurations obtained from steady-state adjoint optimisation, by Christian T. Jacobs and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
physics.flu-dyn
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2016-01
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CE
math
math.OC
physics

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack