Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:1601.01671

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

arXiv:1601.01671 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 6 Jan 2016 (v1), last revised 11 Mar 2016 (this version, v2)]

Title:SHARP - II. Mass structure in strong lenses is not necessarily dark matter substructure: A flux ratio anomaly from an edge-on disc

Authors:J.- W. Hsueh (1), C. D. Fassnacht (1), S. Vegetti (2), J. P. McKean (3 and 4), C. Spingola (4), M. W. Auger (5), L. V. E. Koopmans (4), D. J. Lagattuta (6) ((1) Department of Physics, University of California, Davis, (2) Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, Garching, Germany, (3) Netherlands Institute for Radio Astornomy, (4) Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, University of Groningen, (5) Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, (6) Université Lyon, CRAL, Observatoire de Lyon)
View a PDF of the paper titled SHARP - II. Mass structure in strong lenses is not necessarily dark matter substructure: A flux ratio anomaly from an edge-on disc, by J.- W. Hsueh (1) and 20 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Gravitational lens flux-ratio anomalies provide a powerful technique for measuring dark matter substructure in distant galaxies. However, before using these flux-ratio anomalies to test galaxy formation models, it is imperative to ascertain that the given anomalies are indeed due to the presence of dark matter substructure and not due to some other component of the lensing galaxy halo or to propagation effects. Here we present the case of CLASS~B1555+375, which has a strong radio-wavelength flux-ratio anomaly. Our high-resolution near-infrared Keck~II adaptive optics imaging and archival Hubble Space Telescope data reveal the lensing galaxy in this system to have a clear edge-on disc component that crosses directly over the pair of images that exhibit the flux-ratio anomaly. We find that simple models that include the disc can reproduce the cm-wavelength flux-ratio anomaly without requiring additional dark matter substructure. Although further studies are required, our results suggest the assumption that all flux-ratio anomalies are due to a population of dark matter sub-haloes may be incorrect, and analyses that do not account for the full complexity of the lens macro-model may overestimate the substructure mass fraction in massive lensing galaxies.
Comments: 6 pages, submitted to MNRAS
Subjects: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO); Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA)
Cite as: arXiv:1601.01671 [astro-ph.CO]
  (or arXiv:1601.01671v2 [astro-ph.CO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1601.01671
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: MNRAS (November 21, 2016) 463 (1): L51-L55
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slw146
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Jen-Wei Hsueh [view email]
[v1] Wed, 6 Jan 2016 21:00:02 UTC (491 KB)
[v2] Fri, 11 Mar 2016 22:22:50 UTC (494 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled SHARP - II. Mass structure in strong lenses is not necessarily dark matter substructure: A flux ratio anomaly from an edge-on disc, by J.- W. Hsueh (1) and 20 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2016-01
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
astro-ph.GA

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack