Title:Competitive Energy Trading Framework for Demand-side Management in Neighborhood Area Networks

Abstract:In this paper, we analyze three energy trading systems for demand-side management of a residential neighborhood area network using a community energy storage (CES) device and consumer-owned photovoltaic (PV) systems. We consider a fully-competitive CES operator in a non-cooperative Stackelberg game, a benevolent CES operator that has socially favorable regulations with competitive consumers, and a centralized cooperative CES operator that minimizes the total community energy cost. The two former game-theoretic systems consider that the CES operator first maximizes their revenue by setting a pricing signal and trading energy with the grid. Then the users with PV panels play a non-cooperative repeated game following the actions of the CES operator to trade energy with the CES device and the grid to minimize energy costs. The centralized CES operator cooperates with the participating users to minimize the total community energy cost without appropriate incentives. The non-cooperative Stackelberg game with the fully-competitive CES operator has a unique Stackelberg equilibrium at which the CES operator maximizes revenue and users obtain unique Pareto-optimal Nash equilibrium CES energy trading strategies while ensuring the balance between social costs of the two entities. Both CES operator and participating users are simultaneously benefited in the fully-competitive system and the system requires less energy storage resources to give optimal and peak economic benefits than the other two alternative CES operator models. Numerical evaluations prove that the benefits gained thorough the fully-competitive system are robust to imperfect forecasts of PV power generation and user demand of the following day.