Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > stat > arXiv:1512.01631

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Statistics > Methodology

arXiv:1512.01631 (stat)
[Submitted on 5 Dec 2015 (v1), last revised 29 Nov 2017 (this version, v4)]

Title:Hierarchical Sparse Modeling: A Choice of Two Group Lasso Formulations

Authors:Xiaohan Yan, Jacob Bien
View a PDF of the paper titled Hierarchical Sparse Modeling: A Choice of Two Group Lasso Formulations, by Xiaohan Yan and Jacob Bien
View PDF
Abstract:Demanding sparsity in estimated models has become a routine practice in statistics. In many situations, we wish to require that the sparsity patterns attained honor certain problem-specific constraints. Hierarchical sparse modeling (HSM) refers to situations in which these constraints specify that one set of parameters be set to zero whenever another is set to zero. In recent years, numerous papers have developed convex regularizers for this form of sparsity structure, which arises in many areas of statistics including interaction modeling, time series analysis, and covariance estimation. In this paper, we observe that these methods fall into two frameworks, the group lasso (GL) and latent overlapping group lasso (LOG), which have not been systematically compared in the context of HSM. The purpose of this paper is to provide a side-by-side comparison of these two frameworks for HSM in terms of their statistical properties and computational efficiency. We call special attention to GL's more aggressive shrinkage of parameters deep in the hierarchy, a property not shared by LOG. In terms of computation, we introduce a finite-step algorithm that exactly solves the proximal operator of LOG for a certain simple HSM structure; we later exploit this to develop a novel path-based block coordinate descent scheme for general HSM structures. Both algorithms greatly improve the computational performance of LOG. Finally, we compare the two methods in the context of covariance estimation, where we introduce a new sparsely-banded estimator using LOG, which we show achieves the statistical advantages of an existing GL-based method but is simpler to express and more efficient to compute.
Comments: 30 pages, 13 figures
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME); Statistics Theory (math.ST); Computation (stat.CO); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Cite as: arXiv:1512.01631 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:1512.01631v4 [stat.ME] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1512.01631
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Statist. Sci. 32 (2017), no. 4, 531--560
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/17-STS622
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Xiaohan Yan [view email]
[v1] Sat, 5 Dec 2015 07:00:54 UTC (1,548 KB)
[v2] Tue, 29 Nov 2016 02:13:49 UTC (7,425 KB)
[v3] Mon, 3 Jul 2017 04:03:45 UTC (4,015 KB)
[v4] Wed, 29 Nov 2017 20:05:56 UTC (4,133 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Hierarchical Sparse Modeling: A Choice of Two Group Lasso Formulations, by Xiaohan Yan and Jacob Bien
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
stat.ME
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2015-12
Change to browse by:
math
math.ST
stat
stat.CO
stat.ML
stat.TH

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack