Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1511.07558

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Computational Complexity

arXiv:1511.07558 (cs)
[Submitted on 24 Nov 2015]

Title:Lower bounds for constant query affine-invariant LCCs and LTCs

Authors:Arnab Bhattacharyya, Sivakanth Gopi
View a PDF of the paper titled Lower bounds for constant query affine-invariant LCCs and LTCs, by Arnab Bhattacharyya and 1 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Affine-invariant codes are codes whose coordinates form a vector space over a finite field and which are invariant under affine transformations of the coordinate space. They form a natural, well-studied class of codes; they include popular codes such as Reed-Muller and Reed-Solomon. A particularly appealing feature of affine-invariant codes is that they seem well-suited to admit local correctors and testers.
In this work, we give lower bounds on the length of locally correctable and locally testable affine-invariant codes with constant query complexity. We show that if a code $\mathcal{C} \subset \Sigma^{\mathbb{K}^n}$ is an $r$-query locally correctable code (LCC), where $\mathbb{K}$ is a finite field and $\Sigma$ is a finite alphabet, then the number of codewords in $\mathcal{C}$ is at most $\exp(O_{\mathbb{K}, r, |\Sigma|}(n^{r-1}))$. Also, we show that if $\mathcal{C} \subset \Sigma^{\mathbb{K}^n}$ is an $r$-query locally testable code (LTC), then the number of codewords in $\mathcal{C}$ is at most $\exp(O_{\mathbb{K}, r, |\Sigma|}(n^{r-2}))$. The dependence on $n$ in these bounds is tight for constant-query LCCs/LTCs, since Guo, Kopparty and Sudan (ITCS `13) construct affine-invariant codes via lifting that have the same asymptotic tradeoffs. Note that our result holds for non-linear codes, whereas previously, Ben-Sasson and Sudan (RANDOM `11) assumed linearity to derive similar results.
Our analysis uses higher-order Fourier analysis. In particular, we show that the codewords corresponding to an affine-invariant LCC/LTC must be far from each other with respect to Gowers norm of an appropriate order. This then allows us to bound the number of codewords, using known decomposition theorems which approximate any bounded function in terms of a finite number of low-degree non-classical polynomials, upto a small error in the Gowers norm.
Subjects: Computational Complexity (cs.CC)
Cite as: arXiv:1511.07558 [cs.CC]
  (or arXiv:1511.07558v1 [cs.CC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1511.07558
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Sivakanth Gopi [view email]
[v1] Tue, 24 Nov 2015 03:58:22 UTC (18 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Lower bounds for constant query affine-invariant LCCs and LTCs, by Arnab Bhattacharyya and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CC
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2015-11
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Arnab Bhattacharyya
Sivakanth Gopi
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack