Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > gr-qc > arXiv:1511.02085

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

arXiv:1511.02085 (gr-qc)
[Submitted on 6 Nov 2015 (v1), last revised 1 Sep 2016 (this version, v2)]

Title:Discrepancies between observational data and theoretical forecast in single field slow roll inflation

Authors:Jaume Amorós, Jaume de Haro
View a PDF of the paper titled Discrepancies between observational data and theoretical forecast in single field slow roll inflation, by Jaume Amor\'os and Jaume de Haro
View PDF
Abstract:The PLANCK collaboration has determined values for the spectral parameters of the CMB radiation, namely the spectral index $n_s$, its running $\alpha_s$, the running of the running $\beta_s$, using a growing body of measurements of CMB anisotropies by the Planck satellite and other missions. These values do not follow the hierarchy of sizes predicted by single field, slow roll inflationary theory, and are thus difficult to fit for such inflation models.
In this work we present first a study of 49 single field, slow roll inflationary potentials in which we assess the likelyhood of these models fitting the spectral parameters to their currently most accurate determination given by the PLANCK collaboration. We check numerically with a MATLAB program the spectral parameters that each model can yield for a very broad, comprehensive list of possible parameter and field values. The comparison of spectral parameter values supported by the models with their determinations by the PLANCK collaboration leads to the conclusion that the data provided by PLANCK2015 TT+lowP and PLANCK2015 TT,TE,EE+lowP taking into account the running of the running disfavours 40 of the 49 models with confidence level at least 92.8\%.
Next, we discuss the reliability of the current computations of these spectral parameters. We identify a bias in the method of determination of the spectral parameters by least residue parameter fitting (using MCMC or any other scheme) currently used to reconstruct the power spectrum of scalar perturbations. This bias can explain the observed contradiction between theory and observations. Its removal is computationally costly, but necessary in order to compare the forecasts of single field, slow roll theories with observations.
Comments: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1503.02153. Version accepted in International Journal of Theoretical Physics
Subjects: General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc); Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)
Cite as: arXiv:1511.02085 [gr-qc]
  (or arXiv:1511.02085v2 [gr-qc] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1511.02085
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-016-3159-8
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Jaume Haro [view email]
[v1] Fri, 6 Nov 2015 14:12:21 UTC (27 KB)
[v2] Thu, 1 Sep 2016 08:16:53 UTC (27 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Discrepancies between observational data and theoretical forecast in single field slow roll inflation, by Jaume Amor\'os and Jaume de Haro
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
gr-qc
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2015-11
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
astro-ph.CO

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack