close this message
arXiv smileybones

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

Work on one of the world's most important websites and make an impact on open science.

View Jobs
Skip to main content
Cornell University

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

View Jobs
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:1504.03134

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena

arXiv:1504.03134 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 13 Apr 2015 (v1), last revised 21 Jul 2015 (this version, v2)]

Title:Theoretical uncertainties in extracting cosmic-ray diffusion parameters: the boron-to-carbon ratio

Authors:Y. Genolini, A. Putze, P. Salati, P. D. Serpico
View a PDF of the paper titled Theoretical uncertainties in extracting cosmic-ray diffusion parameters: the boron-to-carbon ratio, by Y. Genolini and A. Putze and P. Salati and P. D. Serpico
View PDF
Abstract:PAMELA and, more recently, AMS-02, are ushering us into a new era of greatly reduced statistical uncertainties in experimental measurements of cosmic-ray fluxes. In particular, new determinations of traditional diagnostic tools such as the boron-to-carbon ratio (B/C) are expected to significantly reduce errors on cosmic-ray diffusion parameters, with important implications for astroparticle physics, ranging from inferring primary source spectra to indirect dark matter searches. It is timely to stress, however, that the conclusions obtained crucially depend on the framework in which the data are interpreted as well as from some nuclear input parameters. We aim at assessing the theoretical uncertainties affecting the outcome, with models as simple as possible while still retaining the key dependencies. We compare different semi-analytical, two-zone model descriptions of cosmic-ray transport in the Galaxy. We test for the effect of a primary source contamination in the boron flux by parametrically altering its flux, as well as for nuclear cross section uncertainties. Our study on preliminary results from AMS-02 suggests that, differently for instance from the leptonic case, realistic modelling of the geometry of the Galaxy and of the source distribution are of minor importance to correctly reproduce B/C data at high energies and thus, to a large extent, for the extraction of diffusion parameters. The Ansatz on the lack of primary injection of boron represents the most serious bias, and requires multi-messenger studies to be addressed. If this uncertainty could be lifted, nuclear uncertainties would still represent a serious concern, which degrade the systematic error on the inferred parameters to the 20% level, or three times the estimated experimental sensitivity. In order to reduce this, a new nuclear cross section measurement campaign is probably required.
Comments: 14 pages, 11 figures, 4 tables, published in A&A
Subjects: High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena (astro-ph.HE)
Report number: LAPTH-018/15
Cite as: arXiv:1504.03134 [astro-ph.HE]
  (or arXiv:1504.03134v2 [astro-ph.HE] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1504.03134
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: A&A 580, A9(2015)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526344
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Yoann Genolini [view email]
[v1] Mon, 13 Apr 2015 11:22:33 UTC (1,134 KB)
[v2] Tue, 21 Jul 2015 09:02:54 UTC (1,135 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Theoretical uncertainties in extracting cosmic-ray diffusion parameters: the boron-to-carbon ratio, by Y. Genolini and A. Putze and P. Salati and P. D. Serpico
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.HE
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2015-04
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack