Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:1503.07595

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Solar and Stellar Astrophysics

arXiv:1503.07595 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 26 Mar 2015]

Title:Spectroscopic study of red giants in the Kepler field with asteroseismologically established evolutionary status and stellar parameters

Authors:Yoichi Takeda, Akito Tajitsu
View a PDF of the paper titled Spectroscopic study of red giants in the Kepler field with asteroseismologically established evolutionary status and stellar parameters, by Yoichi Takeda and Akito Tajitsu
View PDF
Abstract:Thanks to the recent very high-precision photometry of red giants from satellites such as Kepler, precise mass and radius values as well as accurate information of evolutionary stages are already established by asteroseismic approach for a large number of G-K giants. Based on the high-dispersion spectra of selected such 55 red giants in the Kepler field with precisely known seismic parameters (among which parallaxes are available for 9 stars), we checked the accuracy of the determination method of stellar parameters previously applied to many red giants by Takeda et al. (2008, PASJ, 60, 781), since it may be possible to discriminate their complex evolutionary status by using the surface gravity vs. mass diagram. We confirmed that our spectroscopic gravity and the seismic gravity satisfactorily agree with each other (to within ~0.1 dex) without any systematic difference. However, the mass values of He-burning red clump giants derived from stellar evolutionary tracks (~2-3 Msun) were found to be markedly larger by ~50% compared to the seismic values (~1-2 Msun) though such discrepancy is not seen for normal giants in the H-burning phase, which reflects the difficulty of mass determination from intricately overlapping tracks on the luminosity vs. effective temperature diagram. This consequence implies that the mass results of many red giants in the clump region determined by Takeda et al. (2008) are likely to be significantly overestimated. We also compare our spectroscopically established parameters with recent literature values, and further discuss the prospect of distinguishing the evolutionary status of red giants based on the conventional (i.e., non-seismic) approach.
Comments: 18 pages, 14 figures, 3 tables, 2 online data tables (ancillary files) accepted for publication in MNRAS
Subjects: Solar and Stellar Astrophysics (astro-ph.SR)
Cite as: arXiv:1503.07595 [astro-ph.SR]
  (or arXiv:1503.07595v1 [astro-ph.SR] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1503.07595
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv682
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Yoichi Takeda [view email]
[v1] Thu, 26 Mar 2015 01:43:12 UTC (2,289 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Spectroscopic study of red giants in the Kepler field with asteroseismologically established evolutionary status and stellar parameters, by Yoichi Takeda and Akito Tajitsu
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Ancillary-file links:

Ancillary files (details):

  • ReadMe.txt
  • tableE1.dat
  • tableE2.dat
Current browse context:
astro-ph.SR
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2015-03
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack