Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:1503.03310

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Solar and Stellar Astrophysics

arXiv:1503.03310 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 11 Mar 2015 (v1), last revised 13 Jan 2016 (this version, v4)]

Title:On the diversity of super-luminous supernovae: ejected mass as the dominant factor

Authors:M. Nicholl, S. J. Smartt, A. Jerkstrand, C. Inserra, S. A. Sim, T.-W. Chen, S. Benetti, M. Fraser, A. Gal-Yam, E. Kankare, K. Maguire, K. Smith, M. Sullivan, S. Valenti, D. R. Young, C. Baltay, F. E. Bauer, S. Baumont, D. Bersier, M.-T. Botticella, M. Childress, M. Dennefeld, M. Della Valle, N. Elias-Rosa, U. Feindt, L. Galbany, E. Hadjiyska, L. Le Guillou, G. Leloudas, P. Mazzali, R. McKinnon, J. Polshaw, D. Rabinowitz, S. Rostami, R. Scalzo, B. P. Schmidt, S. Schulze, J. Sollerman, F. Taddia, F. Yuan
View a PDF of the paper titled On the diversity of super-luminous supernovae: ejected mass as the dominant factor, by M. Nicholl and 39 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:We assemble a sample of 24 hydrogen-poor super-luminous supernovae (SLSNe). Parameterizing the light curve shape through rise and decline timescales shows that the two are highly correlated. Magnetar-powered models can reproduce the correlation, with the diversity in rise and decline rates driven by the diffusion timescale. Circumstellar interaction models can exhibit a similar rise-decline relation, but only for a narrow range of densities, which may be problematic for these models. We find that SLSNe are approximately 3.5 magnitudes brighter and have light curves 3 times broader than SNe Ibc, but that the intrinsic shapes are similar. There are a number of SLSNe with particularly broad light curves, possibly indicating two progenitor channels, but statistical tests do not cleanly separate two populations. The general spectral evolution is also presented. Velocities measured from Fe II are similar for SLSNe and SNe Ibc, suggesting that diffusion time differences are dominated by mass or opacity. Flat velocity evolution in most SLSNe suggests a dense shell of ejecta. If opacities in SLSNe are similar to other SNe Ibc, the average ejected mass is higher by a factor 2-3. Assuming $\kappa=0.1\,$cm$^2\,$g$^{-1}$, we estimate a mean (median) SLSN ejecta mass of 10$\,$M$_\odot$ (6$\,$M$_\odot$), with a range of 3-30$\,$M$_\odot$. Doubling the assumed opacity brings the masses closer to normal SNe Ibc, but with a high-mass tail. The most probable mechanism for generating SLSNe seems to be the core-collapse of a very massive hydrogen-poor star, forming a millisecond magnetar.
Comments: 28 pages, 22 figs, 4 tables -- Updated on 2016-01-13 to fix typo in Table 1
Subjects: Solar and Stellar Astrophysics (astro-ph.SR); Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO); High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena (astro-ph.HE)
Cite as: arXiv:1503.03310 [astro-ph.SR]
  (or arXiv:1503.03310v4 [astro-ph.SR] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1503.03310
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: MNRAS, 452, 3869 (2016)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1522
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Matt Nicholl [view email]
[v1] Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:47:05 UTC (1,682 KB)
[v2] Thu, 12 Mar 2015 11:34:05 UTC (1,682 KB)
[v3] Tue, 7 Jul 2015 11:50:15 UTC (1,618 KB)
[v4] Wed, 13 Jan 2016 16:26:13 UTC (1,618 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled On the diversity of super-luminous supernovae: ejected mass as the dominant factor, by M. Nicholl and 39 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.SR
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2015-03
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
astro-ph.CO
astro-ph.HE

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack