Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > stat > arXiv:1411.5086

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Statistics > Machine Learning

arXiv:1411.5086 (stat)
[Submitted on 19 Nov 2014 (v1), last revised 29 Apr 2015 (this version, v2)]

Title:Designing Optimal Mortality Risk Prediction Scores that Preserve Clinical Knowledge

Authors:Natalia M. Arzeno, Karla A. Lawson, Sarah V. Duzinski, Haris Vikalo
View a PDF of the paper titled Designing Optimal Mortality Risk Prediction Scores that Preserve Clinical Knowledge, by Natalia M. Arzeno and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Many in-hospital mortality risk prediction scores dichotomize predictive variables to simplify the score calculation. However, hard thresholding in these additive stepwise scores of the form "add x points if variable v is above/below threshold t" may lead to critical failures. In this paper, we seek to develop risk prediction scores that preserve clinical knowledge embedded in features and structure of the existing additive stepwise scores while addressing limitations caused by variable dichotomization. To this end, we propose a novel score structure that relies on a transformation of predictive variables by means of nonlinear logistic functions facilitating smooth differentiation between critical and normal values of the variables. We develop an optimization framework for inferring parameters of the logistic functions for a given patient population via cyclic block coordinate descent. The parameters may readily be updated as the patient population and standards of care evolve. We tested the proposed methodology on two populations: (1) brain trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit of the Dell Children's Medical Center of Central Texas between 2007 and 2012, and (2) adult ICU patient data from the MIMIC II database. The results are compared with those obtained by the widely used PRISM III and SOFA scores. The prediction power of a score is evaluated using area under ROC curve, Youden's index, and precision-recall balance in a cross-validation study. The results demonstrate that the new framework enables significant performance improvements over PRISM III and SOFA in terms of all three criteria.
Comments: 30 pages, 5 figures
Subjects: Machine Learning (stat.ML); Applications (stat.AP)
Cite as: arXiv:1411.5086 [stat.ML]
  (or arXiv:1411.5086v2 [stat.ML] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1411.5086
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Natalia Arzeno [view email]
[v1] Wed, 19 Nov 2014 01:15:49 UTC (47 KB)
[v2] Wed, 29 Apr 2015 18:20:46 UTC (81 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Designing Optimal Mortality Risk Prediction Scores that Preserve Clinical Knowledge, by Natalia M. Arzeno and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
stat.ML
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2014-11
Change to browse by:
stat
stat.AP

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack