Statistics > Methodology
[Submitted on 11 Sep 2014]
Title:Partial Correlation Screening for Estimating Large Precision Matrices, with Applications to Classification
View PDFAbstract:We propose Partial Correlation Screening (PCS) as a new row-by-row approach to estimating a large precision matrix $\Omega$. To estimate the $i$-th row of $\Omega$, $1 \leq i \leq p$, PCS uses a Screen step and a Clean step. In the Screen step, PCS recruits a (small) subset of indices using a stage-wise algorithm, where in each stage, the algorithm updates the set of recruited indices by adding the index $j$ that has the largest (in magnitude) empirical partial correlation with $i$. In the Clean step, PCS re-investigates all recruited indices and use them to reconstruct the $i$-th row of $\Omega$.
PCS is computationally efficient and modest in memory use: to estimate a row of $\Omega$, it only needs a few rows (determined sequentially) of the empirical covariance matrix. This enables PCS to execute the estimation of a large precision matrix (e.g., $p=10K$) in a few minutes, and open doors to estimating much larger precision matrices.
We use PCS for classification. Higher Criticism Thresholding (HCT) is a recent classifier that enjoys optimality, but to exploit its full potential in practice, one needs a good estimate of the precision matrix $\Omega$. Combining HCT with any approach to estimating $\Omega$ gives a new classifier: examples include HCT-PCS and HCT-glasso. We have applied HCT-PCS to two large microarray data sets ($p = 8K$ and $10K$) for classification, where it not only significantly outperforms HCT-glasso, but also is competitive to the Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest (RF). The results suggest that PCS gives more useful estimates of $\Omega$ than the glasso.
We set up a general theoretical framework and show that in a broad context, PCS fully recovers the support of $\Omega$ and HCT-PCS yields optimal classification behavior. Our proofs shed interesting light on the behavior of stage-wise procedures.
Current browse context:
stat.ME
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.