Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cond-mat > arXiv:1408.7088

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Condensed Matter > Statistical Mechanics

arXiv:1408.7088 (cond-mat)
[Submitted on 29 Aug 2014]

Title:Determining efficient temperature sets for the simulated tempering method

Authors:A. Valentim, M. G. E. da Luz, Carlos E. Fiore
View a PDF of the paper titled Determining efficient temperature sets for the simulated tempering method, by A. Valentim and 1 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:In statistical physics, the efficiency of tempering approaches strongly depends on ingredients such as the number of replicas $R$, reliable determination of weight factors and the set of used temperatures, ${\mathcal T}_R = \{T_1, T_2, \ldots, T_R\}$. For the simulated tempering (SP) in particular -- useful due to its generality and conceptual simplicity -- the latter aspect (closely related to the actual $R$) may be a key issue in problems displaying metastability and trapping in certain regions of the phase space. To determine ${\mathcal T}_R$'s leading to accurate thermodynamics estimates and still trying to minimize the simulation computational time, here it is considered a fixed exchange frequency scheme for the ST. From the temperature of interest $T_1$, successive $T$'s are chosen so that the exchange frequency between any adjacent pair $T_r$ and $T_{r+1}$ has a same value $f$. By varying the $f$'s and analyzing the ${\mathcal T}_R$'s through relatively inexpensive tests (e.g., time decay toward the steady regime), an optimal situation in which the simulations visit much faster and more uniformly the relevant portions of the phase space is determined. As illustrations, the proposal is applied to three lattice models, BEG, Bell-Lavis, and Potts, in the hard case of extreme first-order phase transitions, always giving very good results, even for $R=3$. Also, comparisons with other protocols (constant entropy and arithmetic progression) to choose the set ${\mathcal T}_R$ are undertaken. The fixed exchange frequency method is found to be consistently superior, specially for small $R$'s. Finally, distinct instances where the prescription could be helpful (in second-order transitions and for the parallel tempering approach) are briefly discussed.
Comments: 10 pages, 14 figures
Subjects: Statistical Mechanics (cond-mat.stat-mech)
Cite as: arXiv:1408.7088 [cond-mat.stat-mech]
  (or arXiv:1408.7088v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1408.7088
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Comput. Phys. Comm. 185, 2046 (2014)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2014.04.010
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Carlos Eduardo Fiore Santos [view email]
[v1] Fri, 29 Aug 2014 17:51:12 UTC (206 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Determining efficient temperature sets for the simulated tempering method, by A. Valentim and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cond-mat.stat-mech
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2014-08
Change to browse by:
cond-mat

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack