High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
[Submitted on 6 Aug 2014 (this version), latest version 20 Jul 2015 (v4)]
Title:A Possible Solution to the $B\to ππ$ Puzzle Using the Principle of Maximum Conformality
View PDFAbstract:The measured $B_d \to \pi^0\pi^0$ branching fraction deviates significantly from conventional QCD predictions, a puzzle which has persisted for more than 10 years. This may be a hint of new physics beyond the Standard Model; however, as we shall show in this paper, the pQCD prediction is highly sensitive to the choice of the renormalization scales which enter the decay amplitude. It is conventional to choose a typical momentum transfer as the renormalization scale and take an arbitrary range to estimate the theory uncertainty. However, the prediction using this procedure depends on the renormalization scheme, leaves a non-convergent renormalon series, and gives an arbitrary estimate of the systematic error. In contrast, if one fixes the renormalization scale using the Principle of Maximum Conformality (PMC), all non-conformal $\{\beta_i\}$-terms in the perturbative expansion series are resummed into the running coupling, one then obtains a unique, scale-fixed, scheme-independent prediction at any finite order. The PMC is a generalization of the BLM procedure, and it reduces in the Abelian limit to the standard Gell Mann-Low procedure used for precision tests of QED. We show that the renormalization scale uncertainties for $B\to \pi\pi$ can be greatly reduced by applying PMC scale-setting. Combining the errors in quadrature, we obtain ${\cal B}(B_{d}\to \pi^0\pi^0)|_{\rm PMC} = (0.95^{+0.65}_{-0.51}) \times10^{-6}$ by using the "massive" analytic pQCD model for the running coupling. All of the $B \to \pi \pi $ branching fractions predicted by the PMC are consistent with the Particle Data Group average values.
Submission history
From: Rui-Lin Zhu [view email][v1] Wed, 6 Aug 2014 01:36:20 UTC (23 KB)
[v2] Sun, 21 Sep 2014 14:19:35 UTC (23 KB)
[v3] Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:03:03 UTC (24 KB)
[v4] Mon, 20 Jul 2015 08:26:47 UTC (26 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.