close this message
arXiv smileybones

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

Work on one of the world's most important websites and make an impact on open science.

View Jobs
Skip to main content
Cornell University

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

View Jobs
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1404.7479

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Data Structures and Algorithms

arXiv:1404.7479 (cs)
[Submitted on 29 Apr 2014]

Title:The Power of Two Choices in Distributed Voting

Authors:Colin Cooper, Robert Elsässer, Tomasz Radzik
View a PDF of the paper titled The Power of Two Choices in Distributed Voting, by Colin Cooper and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Distributed voting is a fundamental topic in distributed computing. In pull voting, in each step every vertex chooses a neighbour uniformly at random, and adopts its opinion. The voting is completed when all vertices hold the same opinion. On many graph classes including regular graphs, pull voting requires $\Theta(n)$ expected steps to complete, even if initially there are only two distinct opinions.
In this paper we consider a related process which we call two-sample voting: every vertex chooses two random neighbours in each step. If the opinions of these neighbours coincide, then the vertex revises its opinion according to the chosen sample. Otherwise, it keeps its own opinion. We consider the performance of this process in the case where two different opinions reside on vertices of some (arbitrary) sets $A$ and $B$, respectively. Here, $|A| + |B| = n$ is the number of vertices of the graph.
We show that there is a constant $K$ such that if the initial imbalance between the two opinions is ?$\nu_0 = (|A| - |B|)/n \geq K \sqrt{(1/d) + (d/n)}$, then with high probability two sample voting completes in a random $d$ regular graph in $O(\log n)$ steps and the initial majority opinion wins. We also show the same performance for any regular graph, if $\nu_0 \geq K \lambda_2$ where $\lambda_2$ is the second largest eigenvalue of the transition matrix. In the graphs we consider, standard pull voting requires $\Omega(n)$ steps, and the minority can still win with probability $|B|/n$.
Comments: 22 pages
Subjects: Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS)
MSC classes: 68
Cite as: arXiv:1404.7479 [cs.DS]
  (or arXiv:1404.7479v1 [cs.DS] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1404.7479
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Robert Elsässer [view email]
[v1] Tue, 29 Apr 2014 19:46:19 UTC (28 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled The Power of Two Choices in Distributed Voting, by Colin Cooper and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.DS
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2014-04
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Colin Cooper
Robert Elsässer
Tomasz Radzik
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack