Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Digital Libraries

arXiv:1404.2505 (cs)
[Submitted on 9 Apr 2014 (v1), last revised 14 Jun 2014 (this version, v3)]

Title:Aggregated journal-journal citation relations in Scopus and Web-of-Science matched and compared in terms of networks, maps, and interactive overlays

Authors:Loet Leydesdorff, Félix de Moya-Anegón, Wouter de Nooy
View PDF
Abstract:We compare the network of aggregated journal-journal citation relations provided by the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) 2012 of the Science and Social Science Citation Indexes (SCI and SSCI) with similar data based on Scopus 2012. First, global maps were developed for the two sets separately; sets of documents can then be compared using overlays to both maps. Using fuzzy-string matching and ISSN numbers, we were able to match 10,524 journal names between the two sets; that is, 96.4% of the 10,936 journals contained in JCR or 51.2% of the 20,554 journals covered by Scopus. Network analysis was then pursued on the set of journals shared between the two databases and the two sets of unique journals. Citations among the shared journals are more comprehensively covered in JCR than Scopus, so the network in JCR is denser and more connected than in Scopus. The ranking of shared journals in terms of indegree (that is, numbers of citing journals) or total citations is similar in both databases overall (Spearman's \r{ho} > 0.97), but some individual journals rank very differently. Journals that are unique to Scopus seem to be less important--they are citing shared journals rather than being cited by them--but the humanities are covered better in Scopus than in JCR.
Comments: the paper is accepted for publication in the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (JASIST)
Subjects: Digital Libraries (cs.DL)
Cite as: arXiv:1404.2505 [cs.DL]
  (or arXiv:1404.2505v3 [cs.DL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1404.2505

Submission history

From: Loet Leydesdorff [view email]
[v1] Wed, 9 Apr 2014 14:47:57 UTC (1,283 KB)
[v2] Fri, 11 Apr 2014 06:57:34 UTC (1,281 KB)
[v3] Sat, 14 Jun 2014 11:44:31 UTC (1,561 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.DL
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2014-04
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Loet Leydesdorff
Félix de Moya Anegón
Wouter de Nooy
export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)