Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > q-bio > arXiv:1312.7111

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Quantitative Biology > Genomics

arXiv:1312.7111 (q-bio)
[Submitted on 26 Dec 2013 (v1), last revised 11 Feb 2014 (this version, v4)]

Title:The shrinking human protein coding complement: are there now fewer than 20,000 genes?

Authors:Iakes Ezkurdia, David Juan, Jose Manuel Rodriguez, Adam Frankish, Mark Diekhans, Jennifer Harrow, Jesus Vazquez, Alfonso Valencia, Michael L. Tress
View a PDF of the paper titled The shrinking human protein coding complement: are there now fewer than 20,000 genes?, by Iakes Ezkurdia and 8 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Determining the full complement of protein-coding genes is a key goal of genome annotation. The most powerful approach for confirming protein coding potential is the detection of cellular protein expression through peptide mass spectrometry experiments. Here we map the peptides detected in 7 large-scale proteomics studies to almost 60% of the protein coding genes in the GENCODE annotation the human genome. We find that conservation across vertebrate species and the age of the gene family are key indicators of whether a peptide will be detected in proteomics experiments. We find peptides for most highly conserved genes and for practically all genes that evolved before bilateria. At the same time there is almost no evidence of protein expression for genes that have appeared since primates, or for genes that do not have any protein-like features or cross-species conservation. We identify 19 non-protein-like features such as weak conservation, no protein features or ambiguous annotations in major databases that are indicators of low peptide detection rates. We use these features to describe a set of 2,001 genes that are potentially non-coding, and show that many of these genes behave more like non-coding genes than protein-coding genes. We detect peptides for just 3% of these genes. We suggest that many of these 2,001 genes do not code for proteins under normal circumstances and that they should not be included in the human protein coding gene catalogue. These potential non-coding genes will be revised as part of the ongoing human genome annotation effort.
Comments: Main article 34 pages, 1 1/2 spaced, five figures, one table. Supplementary info, 13 pages, 10 figures Update no 1: Version 4: small change in numbers between version 1 and 2 was because we removed the pseudoautosomal genes. The number 11,838 in version 2 is a typo
Subjects: Genomics (q-bio.GN); Molecular Networks (q-bio.MN); Populations and Evolution (q-bio.PE)
Cite as: arXiv:1312.7111 [q-bio.GN]
  (or arXiv:1312.7111v4 [q-bio.GN] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1312.7111
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Michael Tress [view email]
[v1] Thu, 26 Dec 2013 14:22:23 UTC (1,527 KB)
[v2] Wed, 1 Jan 2014 21:20:56 UTC (1,541 KB)
[v3] Thu, 23 Jan 2014 12:59:37 UTC (1,645 KB)
[v4] Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:23:44 UTC (1,645 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled The shrinking human protein coding complement: are there now fewer than 20,000 genes?, by Iakes Ezkurdia and 8 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
q-bio.GN
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2013-12
Change to browse by:
q-bio
q-bio.MN
q-bio.PE

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

2 blog links

(what is this?)
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack