close this message
arXiv smileybones

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

Work on one of the world's most important websites and make an impact on open science.

View Jobs
Skip to main content
Cornell University

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

View Jobs
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1304.3812

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Cryptography and Security

arXiv:1304.3812 (cs)
[Submitted on 13 Apr 2013 (v1), last revised 8 Feb 2017 (this version, v4)]

Title:Time-Optimal Interactive Proofs for Circuit Evaluation

Authors:Justin Thaler
View a PDF of the paper titled Time-Optimal Interactive Proofs for Circuit Evaluation, by Justin Thaler
View PDF
Abstract:Recently, researchers have been working toward the development of practical general-purpose protocols for verifiable computation. These protocols enable a computationally weak verifier to offload computations to a powerful but untrusted prover, while providing the verifier with a guarantee that the prover performed the computations correctly. Despite substantial progress, existing implementations are not yet practical. The main bottleneck is typically the extra effort required by the prover to return an answer with a guarantee of correctness, compared to returning an answer with no guarantee.
We describe a refinement of a powerful interactive proof protocol originally due to Goldwasser, Kalai, and Rothblum. Cormode, Mitzenmacher, and Thaler show how to implement the prover in this protocol in time O(S log S), where S is the size of an arithmetic circuit computing the function of interest. Our refinements apply to circuits whose wiring pattern is sufficiently "regular"; for these circuits, we bring the runtime of the prover down to O(S). That is, our prover can evaluate the circuit with a guarantee of correctness, with only a constant-factor blowup in work compared to evaluating the circuit with no guarantee.
We argue that our refinements capture a large class of circuits, and prove some theorems formalizing this. Experimentally, our refinements yield a 200x speedup for the prover over the implementation of Cormode et al., and our prover is less than 10x slower than a C++ program that simply evaluates the circuit. Along the way, we describe a special-purpose protocol for matrix multiplication that is of interest in its own right.
Our final contribution is a protocol targeted at general data parallel computation. Compared to prior work, this protocol can more efficiently verify complicated computations as long as that computation is applied independently to many pieces of data.
Comments: This version corrects a confusing typographical error in Section 7. We are grateful to Michael Walfish for identifying the error
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Computational Complexity (cs.CC); Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS)
Cite as: arXiv:1304.3812 [cs.CR]
  (or arXiv:1304.3812v4 [cs.CR] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1304.3812
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Justin Thaler [view email]
[v1] Sat, 13 Apr 2013 14:47:09 UTC (776 KB)
[v2] Thu, 6 Jun 2013 20:30:31 UTC (777 KB)
[v3] Sat, 27 Jul 2013 18:23:12 UTC (777 KB)
[v4] Wed, 8 Feb 2017 18:57:37 UTC (777 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Time-Optimal Interactive Proofs for Circuit Evaluation, by Justin Thaler
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2013-04
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CC
cs.DS

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Justin Thaler
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack