Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1302.3741

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Logic in Computer Science

arXiv:1302.3741 (cs)
[Submitted on 15 Feb 2013 (v1), last revised 26 Apr 2013 (this version, v2)]

Title:Upper bounds for Newton's method on monotone polynomial systems, and P-time model checking of probabilistic one-counter automata

Authors:Alistair Stewart, Kousha Etessami, Mihalis Yannakakis
View a PDF of the paper titled Upper bounds for Newton's method on monotone polynomial systems, and P-time model checking of probabilistic one-counter automata, by Alistair Stewart and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:A central computational problem for analyzing and model checking various classes of infinite-state recursive probabilistic systems (including quasi-birth-death processes, multi-type branching processes, stochastic context-free grammars, probabilistic pushdown automata and recursive Markov chains) is the computation of {\em termination probabilities}, and computing these probabilities in turn boils down to computing the {\em least fixed point} (LFP) solution of a corresponding {\em monotone polynomial system} (MPS) of equations, denoted x=P(x).
It was shown by Etessami & Yannakakis that a decomposed variant of Newton's method converges monotonically to the LFP solution for any MPS that has a non-negative solution. Subsequently, Esparza, Kiefer, & Luttenberger obtained upper bounds on the convergence rate of Newton's method for certain classes of MPSs. More recently, better upper bounds have been obtained for special classes of MPSs. However, prior to this paper, for arbitrary (not necessarily strongly-connected) MPSs, no upper bounds at all were known on the convergence rate of Newton's method as a function of the encoding size |P| of the input MPS, x=P(x).
In this paper we provide worst-case upper bounds, as a function of both the input encoding size |P|, and epsilon > 0, on the number of iterations required for decomposed Newton's method (even with rounding) to converge within additive error epsilon > 0 of q^*, for any MPS with LFP solution q^*. Our upper bounds are essentially optimal in terms of several important parameters.
Using our upper bounds, and building on prior work, we obtain the first P-time algorithm (in the standard Turing model of computation) for quantitative model checking, to within desired precision, of discrete-time QBDs and (equivalently) probabilistic 1-counter automata, with respect to any (fixed) omega-regular or LTL property.
Subjects: Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO); Computational Complexity (cs.CC)
Cite as: arXiv:1302.3741 [cs.LO]
  (or arXiv:1302.3741v2 [cs.LO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1302.3741
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Kousha Etessami [view email]
[v1] Fri, 15 Feb 2013 12:48:20 UTC (38 KB)
[v2] Fri, 26 Apr 2013 21:55:16 UTC (37 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Upper bounds for Newton's method on monotone polynomial systems, and P-time model checking of probabilistic one-counter automata, by Alistair Stewart and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.LO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2013-02
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CC

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Alistair Stewart
Kousha Etessami
Mihalis Yannakakis
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack