Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1301.5121

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Databases

arXiv:1301.5121 (cs)
[Submitted on 22 Jan 2013]

Title:Partitioning Graph Databases - A Quantitative Evaluation

Authors:Alex Averbuch, Martin Neumann
View a PDF of the paper titled Partitioning Graph Databases - A Quantitative Evaluation, by Alex Averbuch and 1 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Electronic data is growing at increasing rates, in both size and connectivity: the increasing presence of, and interest in, relationships between data. An example is the Twitter social network graph. Due to this growth demand is increasing for technologies that can process such data. Currently relational databases are the predominant technology, but they are poorly suited to processing connected data as they are optimized for index-intensive operations. Conversely, graph databases are optimized for graph computation. They link records by direct references, avoiding index lookups, and enabling retrieval of adjacent elements in constant time, regardless of graph size. However, as data volume increases these databases outgrow the resources of one computer and data partitioning becomes necessary. We evaluate the viability of using graph partitioning algorithms to partition graph databases. A prototype partitioned database was developed. Three partitioning algorithms explored and one implemented. Three graph datasets were used: two real and one synthetically generated. These were partitioned in various ways and the impact on database performance measured. We defined one synthetic access pattern per dataset and executed each on the partitioned datasets. Evaluation took place in a simulation environment, ensuring repeatability and allowing measurement of metrics like network traffic and load balance. Results show that compared to random partitioning the partitioning algorithm reduced traffic by 40-90%. Executing the algorithm intermittently during usage maintained partition quality, while requiring only 1% the computation of initial partitioning. Strong correlations were found between theoretic quality metrics and generated network traffic under non-uniform access patterns.
Subjects: Databases (cs.DB); Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC)
Cite as: arXiv:1301.5121 [cs.DB]
  (or arXiv:1301.5121v1 [cs.DB] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1301.5121
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Alex Averbuch [view email]
[v1] Tue, 22 Jan 2013 09:48:34 UTC (7,170 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Partitioning Graph Databases - A Quantitative Evaluation, by Alex Averbuch and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.DB
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2013-01
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.DC

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Alex Averbuch
Martin Neumann
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack