Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Programming Languages

arXiv:1212.3879 (cs)
[Submitted on 17 Dec 2012]

Title:Interacting via the Heap in the Presence of Recursion

Authors:Jurriaan Rot (LIACS - Leiden University, The Netherlands), Irina Măriuca Asăvoae (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Romania), Frank de Boer (Centrum Wiskunde en Informatica (CWI), The Netherlands), Marcello M. Bonsangue (LIACS - Leiden University, The Netherlands), Dorel Lucanu (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Romania)
View PDF
Abstract:Almost all modern imperative programming languages include operations for dynamically manipulating the heap, for example by allocating and deallocating objects, and by updating reference fields. In the presence of recursive procedures and local variables the interactions of a program with the heap can become rather complex, as an unbounded number of objects can be allocated either on the call stack using local variables, or, anonymously, on the heap using reference fields. As such a static analysis is, in general, undecidable.
In this paper we study the verification of recursive programs with unbounded allocation of objects, in a simple imperative language for heap manipulation. We present an improved semantics for this language, using an abstraction that is precise. For any program with a bounded visible heap, meaning that the number of objects reachable from variables at any point of execution is bounded, this abstraction is a finitary representation of its behaviour, even though an unbounded number of objects can appear in the state. As a consequence, for such programs model checking is decidable.
Finally we introduce a specification language for temporal properties of the heap, and discuss model checking these properties against heap-manipulating programs.
Comments: In Proceedings ICE 2012, arXiv:1212.3458
Subjects: Programming Languages (cs.PL); Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
ACM classes: F.1.1, F.1.2, F.3.1, F.3.3
Cite as: arXiv:1212.3879 [cs.PL]
  (or arXiv:1212.3879v1 [cs.PL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1212.3879
Journal reference: EPTCS 104, 2012, pp. 99-113
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.104.9

Submission history

From: EPTCS [view email] [via EPTCS proxy]
[v1] Mon, 17 Dec 2012 03:42:47 UTC (30 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.PL
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2012-12
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.LO

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)