Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > physics > arXiv:1210.6570

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Physics > Plasma Physics

arXiv:1210.6570 (physics)
[Submitted on 24 Oct 2012 (v1), last revised 7 Mar 2013 (this version, v2)]

Title:Comparing linear ion-temperature-gradient-driven mode stability of the National Compact Stellarator Experiment and a shaped tokamak

Authors:J. A. Baumgaertel, G. W. Hammett, D. R. Mikkelsen
View a PDF of the paper titled Comparing linear ion-temperature-gradient-driven mode stability of the National Compact Stellarator Experiment and a shaped tokamak, by J. A. Baumgaertel and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:One metric for comparing confinement properties of different magnetic fusion energy configurations is the linear critical gradient of drift wave modes. The critical gradient scale length determines the ratio of the core to pedestal temperature when a plasma is limited to marginal stability in the plasma core. The gyrokinetic turbulence code GS2 was used to calculate critical temperature gradients for the linear, collisionless ion temperature gradient (ITG) mode in the National Compact Stellarator Experiment (NCSX) and a prototypical shaped tokamak, based on the profiles of a JET H-mode shot and the stronger shaping of ARIES-AT. While a concern was that the narrow cross section of NCSX at some toroidal locations would result in steep gradients that drive instabilities more easily, it is found that other stabilizing effects of the stellarator configuration offset this so that the normalized critical gradients for NCSX are competitive with or even better than for the tokamak. For the adiabatic ITG mode, NCSX and the tokamak had similar critical gradients, though beyond marginal stability, NCSX had larger growth rates. However, for the kinetic ITG mode, NCSX had a higher critical gradient and lower growth rates until a/L_T is approximately 1.5 times a/L_{T,crit}, when it surpassed the tokamak's. A discussion of the results presented with respect to a/L_T vs. R/L_T is included.
Comments: Accepted to Physics of Plasmas. 8 pages, 16 figures
Subjects: Plasma Physics (physics.plasm-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:1210.6570 [physics.plasm-ph]
  (or arXiv:1210.6570v2 [physics.plasm-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1210.6570
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Phys. Plasmas 20, 022305 (2013)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4791657
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Jessica Baumgaertel [view email]
[v1] Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:20:38 UTC (1,580 KB)
[v2] Thu, 7 Mar 2013 19:26:15 UTC (1,584 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Comparing linear ion-temperature-gradient-driven mode stability of the National Compact Stellarator Experiment and a shaped tokamak, by J. A. Baumgaertel and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
physics.plasm-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2012-10
Change to browse by:
physics

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack