Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1208.6388v1

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Robotics

arXiv:1208.6388v1 (cs)
[Submitted on 31 Aug 2012]

Title:First Clinical Experience in Urologic Surgery with a Novel Robotic Lightweight Laparoscope Holder

Authors:Jean-Alexandre Long (TIMC), Jacques Tostain, Cecilia Lanchon, Sandrine Voros (TIMC), Maud Medici, Jean-Luc Descotes, Jocelyne Troccaz (TIMC), Philippe Cinquin (TIMC), Jean-Jacques Rambeaud, Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry (TIMC)
View a PDF of the paper titled First Clinical Experience in Urologic Surgery with a Novel Robotic Lightweight Laparoscope Holder, by Jean-Alexandre Long (TIMC) and 9 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Purpose: To report the feasibility and the safety of a surgeon-controlled robotic endoscope holder in laparoscopic surgery. Materials and methods: From March 2010 to September 2010, 20 patients were enrolled prospectively to undergo a laparoscopic surgery using an innovative robotic endoscope holder. Two surgeons performed 6 adrenalectomies, 4 sacrocolpopexies, 5 pyeloplasties, 4 radical prostatectomies and 1 radical nephrectomy. Demographic data, overall set-up time, operative time, number of assistants needed were reviewed. Surgeon's satisfaction regarding the ergonomics was assessed using a ten point scale. Postoperative clinical outcomes were reviewed at day 1 and 1 month postoperatively. Results: The per-protocol analysis was performed on 17 patients for whom the robot was effectively used for surgery. Median age was 63 years, 10 patients were female (59%). Median BMI was 26.8. Surgical procedures were completed with the robot in 12 cases (71 %). Median number of surgical assistant was 0. Overall set-up time with the robot was 19 min, operative time was 130 min) during which the robot was used 71% of the time. Mean hospital stay was 6.94 days $\pm$ 2.3. Median score regarding the easiness of use was 7. Median pain level was 1.5/10 at day 1 and 0 at 1 month postoperatively. Open conversion was needed in 1 case (6 %) and 4 minor complications occurred in 2 patients (12%). Conclusion: This use of this novel robotic laparoscope holder is safe, feasible and it provides a good comfort to the surgeon.
Comments: Journal of Endourology and Part B, Videourology (2012) epub ahead of print
Subjects: Robotics (cs.RO); Medical Physics (physics.med-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:1208.6388 [cs.RO]
  (or arXiv:1208.6388v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1208.6388
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2012.0357
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Jocelyne Troccaz [view email] [via CCSD proxy]
[v1] Fri, 31 Aug 2012 06:30:43 UTC (289 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled First Clinical Experience in Urologic Surgery with a Novel Robotic Lightweight Laparoscope Holder, by Jean-Alexandre Long (TIMC) and 9 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.RO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2012-08
Change to browse by:
cs
physics
physics.med-ph

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Jean-Alexandre Long
Jacques Tostain
Cecilia Lanchon
Sandrine Voros
Maud Medici
…
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack