Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Performance

arXiv:1202.4423 (cs)
[Submitted on 16 Feb 2012]

Title:On the Reliability of RAID Systems: An Argument for More Check Drives

Authors:Sarah Edge Mann, Michael Anderson, Marek Rychlik
View PDF
Abstract:In this paper we address issues of reliability of RAID systems. We focus on "big data" systems with a large number of drives and advanced error correction schemes beyond \RAID{6}. Our RAID paradigm is based on Reed-Solomon codes, and thus we assume that the RAID consists of $N$ data drives and $M$ check drives. The RAID fails only if the combined number of failed drives and sector errors exceeds $M$, a property of Reed-Solomon codes.
We review a number of models considered in the literature and build upon them to construct models usable for a large number of data and check drives. We attempt to account for a significant number of factors that affect RAID reliability, such as drive replacement or lack thereof, mistakes during service such as replacing the wrong drive, delayed repair, and the finite duration of RAID reconstruction. We evaluate the impact of sector failures that do not result in drive replacement.
The reader who needs to consider large $M$ and $N$ will find applicable mathematical techniques concisely summarized here, and should be able to apply them to similar problems. Most methods are based on the theory of continuous time Markov chains, but we move beyond this framework when we consider the fixed time to rebuild broken hard drives, which we model using systems of delay and partial differential equations.
One universal statement is applicable across various models: increasing the number of check drives in all cases increases the reliability of the system, and is vastly superior to other approaches of ensuring reliability such as mirroring.
Comments: 13 pages, 11 figures, 3 tables
Subjects: Performance (cs.PF); Probability (math.PR)
MSC classes: 60K10 (Primary) 62N05, 90B25 (Secondary)
Cite as: arXiv:1202.4423 [cs.PF]
  (or arXiv:1202.4423v1 [cs.PF] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1202.4423

Submission history

From: Marek Rychlik [view email]
[v1] Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:54:13 UTC (227 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.PF
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2012-02
Change to browse by:
cs
math
math.PR

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Sarah Edge Mann
Michael Anderson
Marek Rychlik
export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)