Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Statistics > Methodology

arXiv:1201.3702 (stat)
[Submitted on 18 Jan 2012 (v1), last revised 3 Aug 2012 (this version, v2)]

Title:The coverage probability of confidence intervals in one-way analysis of covariance after two F tests

Authors:Waruni Abeysekera, Paul Kabaila, Oguzhan Yilmaz
View PDF
Abstract:Consider a one-way analysis of covariance model. Suppose that the parameter of interest theta is a specified linear contrast of the expected responses, for a given value of the covariate. Also suppose that the inference of interest is a 1-alpha confidence interval for theta. The following two-stage procedure has been proposed to determine the form of the model. In Stage 1, we carry out an F test of the null hypothesis that the slopes are all zero against the alternative hypothesis that they are not all zero. If this null hypothesis is accepted then we assume that the slopes are all zero; otherwise we proceed to Stage 2. In Stage 2, we carry out an F test of the null hypothesis that the slopes are all equal against the alternative hypothesis that they are not all equal. If this null hypothesis is accepted then we assume that the slopes are all equal; otherwise this assumption is not made. We present a general methodology for the examination of the effect of this two-stage model selection procedure on the coverage probability of a subsequently-constructed confidence interval for theta, with nominal coverage 1-alpha. This methodology is applied to a numerical example for which it is shown that this confidence interval is completely inadequate.
Comments: A few typographical errors have been corrected
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:1201.3702 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:1201.3702v2 [stat.ME] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1201.3702
Journal reference: The coverage probability of confidence intervals in one-way analysis of covariance after two F tests. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 55, 221-234 (2013)

Submission history

From: Paul Kabaila [view email]
[v1] Wed, 18 Jan 2012 06:31:29 UTC (19 KB)
[v2] Fri, 3 Aug 2012 00:29:55 UTC (19 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
stat.ME
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2012-01
Change to browse by:
stat

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)