Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > q-fin > arXiv:1112.1051

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Quantitative Finance > Statistical Finance

arXiv:1112.1051 (q-fin)
[Submitted on 5 Dec 2011]

Title:Predicting Financial Markets: Comparing Survey, News, Twitter and Search Engine Data

Authors:Huina Mao, Scott Counts, Johan Bollen
View a PDF of the paper titled Predicting Financial Markets: Comparing Survey, News, Twitter and Search Engine Data, by Huina Mao and 1 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Financial market prediction on the basis of online sentiment tracking has drawn a lot of attention recently. However, most results in this emerging domain rely on a unique, particular combination of data sets and sentiment tracking tools. This makes it difficult to disambiguate measurement and instrument effects from factors that are actually involved in the apparent relation between online sentiment and market values. In this paper, we survey a range of online data sets (Twitter feeds, news headlines, and volumes of Google search queries) and sentiment tracking methods (Twitter Investor Sentiment, Negative News Sentiment and Tweet & Google Search volumes of financial terms), and compare their value for financial prediction of market indices such as the Dow Jones Industrial Average, trading volumes, and market volatility (VIX), as well as gold prices. We also compare the predictive power of traditional investor sentiment survey data, i.e. Investor Intelligence and Daily Sentiment Index, against those of the mentioned set of online sentiment indicators. Our results show that traditional surveys of Investor Intelligence are lagging indicators of the financial markets. However, weekly Google Insight Search volumes on financial search queries do have predictive value. An indicator of Twitter Investor Sentiment and the frequency of occurrence of financial terms on Twitter in the previous 1-2 days are also found to be very statistically significant predictors of daily market log return. Survey sentiment indicators are however found not to be statistically significant predictors of financial market values, once we control for all other mood indicators as well as the VIX.
Comments: This paper includes 10 pages, 6 figures and 10 tables
Subjects: Statistical Finance (q-fin.ST); Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science (cs.CE); Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:1112.1051 [q-fin.ST]
  (or arXiv:1112.1051v1 [q-fin.ST] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1112.1051
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Huina Mao [view email]
[v1] Mon, 5 Dec 2011 20:36:27 UTC (760 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Predicting Financial Markets: Comparing Survey, News, Twitter and Search Engine Data, by Huina Mao and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
q-fin.ST
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2011-12
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CE
physics
physics.soc-ph
q-fin

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack