Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:1111.5728v1

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

arXiv:1111.5728v1 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 24 Nov 2011 (this version), latest version 10 Jan 2012 (v2)]

Title:The evolving slope of the stellar mass function at 0.6 <= z < 4.5 from deep WFC3 data

Authors:P. Santini, A. Fontana, A. Grazian, S. Salimbeni, F. Fontanot, D. Paris, K. Boutsia, M. Castellano, F. Fiore, S. Gallozzi, E. Giallongo, A. M. Koekemoer, N. Menci, L. Pentericci, R. Somerville
View a PDF of the paper titled The evolving slope of the stellar mass function at 0.6 <= z < 4.5 from deep WFC3 data, by P. Santini and 13 other authors
View PDF
Abstract: We used Early Release Science observations taken with the Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) in the GOODS-S field to study the Galaxy Stellar Mass Function (GSMF) at 0.6<=z<4.5. Deep WFC3 near-IR data (Y down to 27.3, J and H down to 27.4 AB mag at 5 sigma), as well as the deep Ks (down to 25.5 at 5 sigma) Hawk-I band, provide an exquisite sample which makes possible an unprecedented determination of the low-mass-end of the GSMF, thanks to a deep (down to M* ~ 7.6 10^9 Msun at z~3) and at the same time accurate probe of low mass galaxies. Although the area used is relatively small (~33 arcmin^2), still we found general good agreement with previous works on the entire mass range. Our results show that the slope of the faint-end is increasing with redshift, from alpha = -1.44 +/- 0.03 at z~0.8 to alpha = -1.86 +/- 0.16 at z~3, and indications exist that it does not steepen further from z~3 to z~4. This result is robust against the degeneration of the M* parameter. The steepness of the GSMF faint-end solves the well known discrepancy between the Stellar Mass Density (SMD) and the integrated star formation history at z>2. However, we confirm the excess of integrated star formation history with respect to the SMD at z<2, by a factor of ~2-3. The comparison of the observations with theoretical predictions shows that the models forecast a larger abundance of low mass galaxies, at least up to z~3, as well as a dearth of massive galaxies at z~4 with respect to the data, and that the predicted SMD is generally overestimated at z<~2.
Comments: Accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics
Subjects: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)
Cite as: arXiv:1111.5728 [astro-ph.CO]
  (or arXiv:1111.5728v1 [astro-ph.CO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1111.5728
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Paola Santini [view email]
[v1] Thu, 24 Nov 2011 11:26:06 UTC (319 KB)
[v2] Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:26:18 UTC (319 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled The evolving slope of the stellar mass function at 0.6 <= z < 4.5 from deep WFC3 data, by P. Santini and 13 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2011-11
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack