Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
[Submitted on 29 Sep 2011 (v1), last revised 30 Sep 2011 (this version, v2)]
Title:Testing the Low-Mass End of X-Ray Scaling Relations with a Sample of Chandra Galaxy Groups
View PDFAbstract:Well-determined scaling relations between X-ray observables and cluster mass are essential for using large cluster samples for cosmology. Cluster relations such as the Lx-T, M-T, Lx-M relations, have been investigated extensively, however the question remains whether these relations hold true also for groups. Some evidence supports a break at low masses, possibly caused by the influence of non-gravitational physics on low-mass systems. The main goal of this work is to test scaling relations for the low-mass range to check whether there is a systematic difference between clusters and groups, and to extend this method of reliable cluster mass determination for future samples down to the group regime. We compiled a statistically complete sample of 112 X-ray galaxy groups, 26 with Chandra data. Temperature, metallicity, and surface brightness profiles were created, and used to determine the main physical quantities and scaling relations. We then compared the group properties to the HIFLUGCS clusters and other samples. We present profiles and scaling relations of the whole sample. T and Z profiles behave universally, except for the cores. The Lx-T, M-T, Lx-M, Mg-M, M-Yx, and Lx-Yx relations are in good agreement with clusters. The Lx-T relation steepens for T<3keV, which could point to a larger impact of heating mechanisms on cooler systems. We found a strong drop in the gas mass fraction below 1keV, which indicates the ICM is less dominant in groups and the galaxies have a stronger influence on the system. In all relations the intrinsic scatter for groups is larger, which appears not correlated with merger activity but could be due to scatter caused by baryonic physics in the group cores. We also demonstrate the importance of selection effects. We have found evidence for a similarity break between groups and clusters. However this does not have a strong effect on scaling relations.
Submission history
From: Helen Eckmiller [view email][v1] Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:10:57 UTC (341 KB)
[v2] Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:37:47 UTC (341 KB)
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.