Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:1109.6251

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Astrophysics of Galaxies

arXiv:1109.6251 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 28 Sep 2011]

Title:Comparing star formation models with interferometric observations of the protostar NGC 1333 IRAS 4A. I. Magnetohydrodynamic collapse models

Authors:Pau Frau (1), Daniele Galli (2), Josep Miquel Girart (1) ((1) Institut de Ciencies de l'Espai (CSIC-IEEC), (2) Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri (INAF))
View a PDF of the paper titled Comparing star formation models with interferometric observations of the protostar NGC 1333 IRAS 4A. I. Magnetohydrodynamic collapse models, by Pau Frau (1) and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Observations of dust polarized emission toward star forming regions trace the magnetic field component in the plane of the sky and provide constraints to theoretical models of cloud collapse. We compare high-angular resolution observations of the submillimeter polarized emission of the low-mass protostellar source NGC 1333 IRAS 4A with the predictions of three different models of collapse of magnetized molecular cloud cores. We compute the Stokes parameters for the dust emission for the three models. We then convolve the results with the instrumental response of the Submillimeter Array observation toward IRAS 4A. Finally, we compare the synthetic maps with the data, varying the model parameters and orientation, and we assess the quality of the fit by a \chi^2 analysis. High-angular resolution observations of polarized dust emission can constraint the physical properties of protostars. In the case of IRAS 4A, the best agreements with the data is obtained for models of collapse of clouds with mass-to-flux ratio >2 times the critical value, initial uniform magnetic field of strength ~0.5 mG, and age of the order of a few 10^4 yr since the onset of collapse. Magnetic dissipation, if present, is found to occur below the resolution level of the observations. Including a previously measured temperature profile of IRAS 4A leads to a more realistic morphology and intensity distribution. We also show that ALMA has the capability of distinguishing among the three different models adopted in this work. Our results are consistent with the standard theoretical scenario for the formation of low-mass stars, where clouds initially threaded by large-scale magnetic fields become unstable and collapse, trapping the field in the nascent protostar and the surrounding circumstellar disk. In the collapsing cloud, the dynamics is dominated by gravitational and magnetic forces.
Comments: Accepted for publication in Astronomy And Astrophysics. 14 pages, 11 figures, 3 tables. Several the figures are shown at low resolution
Subjects: Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA); Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM); Solar and Stellar Astrophysics (astro-ph.SR)
Cite as: arXiv:1109.6251 [astro-ph.GA]
  (or arXiv:1109.6251v1 [astro-ph.GA] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1109.6251
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201117813
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Pau Frau [view email]
[v1] Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:56:44 UTC (3,475 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Comparing star formation models with interferometric observations of the protostar NGC 1333 IRAS 4A. I. Magnetohydrodynamic collapse models, by Pau Frau (1) and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.GA
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2011-09
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
astro-ph.IM
astro-ph.SR

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack