Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:1108.6058

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

arXiv:1108.6058 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 30 Aug 2011 (v1), last revised 3 May 2012 (this version, v3)]

Title:The stellar masses and specific star-formation rates of submillimetre galaxies

Authors:Michał J. Michałowski (1), James S. Dunlop (1), Michele Cirasuolo (1), Jens Hjorth (2), Christopher C. Hayward (3), Darach Watson (2) ((1) IfA Edinburgh, (2) DARK Copenhagen, (3) CfA, Harvard)
View a PDF of the paper titled The stellar masses and specific star-formation rates of submillimetre galaxies, by Micha{\l} J. Micha{\l}owski (1) and 8 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Establishing the stellar masses (M*), and hence specific star-formation rates (sSFRs) of submillimetre galaxies (SMGs) is crucial for determining their role in the cosmic galaxy/star formation. However, there is as yet no consensus over the typical M* of SMGs. Specifically, even for the same set of SMGs, the reported average M* have ranged over an order of magnitude, from ~5x10^10 Mo to ~5x10^11 Mo. Here we study how different methods of analysis can lead to such widely varying results. We find that, contrary to recent claims in the literature, potential contamination of IRAC 3-8 um photometry from hot dust associated with an active nucleus is not the origin of the published discrepancies in derived M*. Instead, we expose in detail how inferred M* depends on assumptions made in the photometric fitting, and quantify the individual and cumulative effects of different choices of initial mass function, different brands of evolutionary synthesis models, and different forms of assumed star-formation history. We review current observational evidence for and against these alternatives as well as clues from the hydrodynamical simulations, and conclude that, for the most justifiable choices of these model inputs, the average M* of SMGs is ~2x10^11 Mo. We also confirm that this number is perfectly reasonable in the light of the latest measurements of their dynamical masses, and the evolving M* function of the overall galaxy population. M* of this order imply that the average sSFR of SMGs is comparable to that of other star-forming galaxies at z>2, at 2-3 Gyr^-1. This supports the view that, while rare outliers may be found at any M*, most SMGs simply form the top end of the main-sequence of star-forming galaxies at these redshifts. Conversely, this argues strongly against the viewpoint that SMGs are extreme pathological objects, of little relevance in the cosmic history of star-formation.
Comments: Accepted to A&A. 13 pages, 5 figures, 3 tables. Main changes: 1) investigation that the main-sequence does not change the location as much as SMGs when changing SFHs; 2) a new table added with all stellar mass estimates for individual SMGs (machine-readable version in the source file). V3: missing references added
Subjects: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)
Cite as: arXiv:1108.6058 [astro-ph.CO]
  (or arXiv:1108.6058v3 [astro-ph.CO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1108.6058
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: A&A, 2012, Volume 541, A85
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201016308
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Michał Jerzy Michałowski [view email]
[v1] Tue, 30 Aug 2011 20:00:03 UTC (93 KB)
[v2] Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:39:56 UTC (108 KB)
[v3] Thu, 3 May 2012 12:45:06 UTC (108 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled The stellar masses and specific star-formation rates of submillimetre galaxies, by Micha{\l} J. Micha{\l}owski (1) and 8 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2011-08
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack