Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:1108.1175

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

arXiv:1108.1175 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 4 Aug 2011 (v1), last revised 12 Oct 2011 (this version, v2)]

Title:Broadband Photometry of 105 Giant Arcs: Redshift Constraints and Implications for Giant Arc Statistics

Authors:Matthew B. Bayliss
View a PDF of the paper titled Broadband Photometry of 105 Giant Arcs: Redshift Constraints and Implications for Giant Arc Statistics, by Matthew B. Bayliss
View PDF
Abstract:We measure the photometric properties of 105 giant arcs that were identified in systematic searches for galaxy-cluster-scale strong lenses in the Second Red-Sequence Cluster Survey (RCS-2) and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). The cluster lenses span 0.2 < z_lens < 1.2 in redshift, with a median z_lens = 0.58. Using broadband color criteria we sort the entire arc sample into redshift bins based on u-g and g-r colors, and also r-z colors for the ~90% of arcs that have z-band data. This analysis yields broad redshift constraints with 71 +5 -4 % of the arcs at z > 1.0, 64 +6 -4 % at z > 1.4, 56 +5 -4 % at z > 1.9, and 21 +4 -2 % at z > 2.7. The remaining 29 +3 -5 % have z < 1. The inferred median redshift is z_s = 2.0 +/- 0.1, in good agreement with a previous determination from a smaller sample of brighter arcs (g < 22.5). This agreement confirms that z_s = 2.0 +/- 0.1 is the typical redshift for giant arcs with g < 24 that are produced by cluster-scale strong lenses, and that there is no evidence for strong evolution in the redshift distribution of arcs over a wide range of g-band magnitudes (20 < g < 24). Establishing that half of all giant arcs are at z > 2 contributes significantly toward relieving the tension between the number of arcs observed and the number expected in a Lambda-CDM cosmology, but there is considerable evidence to suggest that a discrepancy persists. Additionally, this work confirms that forthcoming large samples of giant arcs will supply the observational community with many magnified galaxies at z > 2.
Comments: 16 pages, 8 figures, 3 tables, Accepted to ApJ; University of Chicago Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics PhD Thesis
Subjects: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)
Cite as: arXiv:1108.1175 [astro-ph.CO]
  (or arXiv:1108.1175v2 [astro-ph.CO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1108.1175
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/156
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Matthew Bayliss [view email]
[v1] Thu, 4 Aug 2011 19:31:45 UTC (127 KB)
[v2] Wed, 12 Oct 2011 02:42:17 UTC (126 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Broadband Photometry of 105 Giant Arcs: Redshift Constraints and Implications for Giant Arc Statistics, by Matthew B. Bayliss
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2011-08
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack