Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1107.5886

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Logic in Computer Science

arXiv:1107.5886 (cs)
[Submitted on 29 Jul 2011]

Title:Three Applications to Rational Relations of the High Undecidability of the Infinite Post Correspondence Problem in a Regular omega-Language

Authors:Olivier Finkel (ELM)
View a PDF of the paper titled Three Applications to Rational Relations of the High Undecidability of the Infinite Post Correspondence Problem in a Regular omega-Language, by Olivier Finkel (ELM)
View PDF
Abstract:It was noticed by Harel in [Har86] that "one can define $\Sigma_1^1$-complete versions of the well-known Post Correspondence Problem". We first give a complete proof of this result, showing that the infinite Post Correspondence Problem in a regular $\omega$-language is $\Sigma_1^1$-complete, hence located beyond the arithmetical hierarchy and highly undecidable. We infer from this result that it is $\Pi_1^1$-complete to determine whether two given infinitary rational relations are disjoint. Then we prove that there is an amazing gap between two decision problems about $\omega$-rational functions realized by finite state Büchi transducers. Indeed Prieur proved in [Pri01, Pri02] that it is decidable whether a given $\omega$-rational function is continuous, while we show here that it is $\Sigma_1^1$-complete to determine whether a given $\omega$-rational function has at least one point of continuity. Next we prove that it is $\Pi_1^1$-complete to determine whether the continuity set of a given $\omega$-rational function is $\omega$-regular. This gives the exact complexity of two problems which were shown to be undecidable in [CFS08].
Comments: To appear in: Special Issue: Frontier Between Decidability and Undecidability and Related Problems, International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science
Subjects: Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO); Computational Complexity (cs.CC); Logic (math.LO)
Cite as: arXiv:1107.5886 [cs.LO]
  (or arXiv:1107.5886v1 [cs.LO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1107.5886
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science 23, 7 (2012) p. 1481-1497
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129054112400606
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Olivier Finkel [view email] [via CCSD proxy]
[v1] Fri, 29 Jul 2011 07:15:04 UTC (16 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Three Applications to Rational Relations of the High Undecidability of the Infinite Post Correspondence Problem in a Regular omega-Language, by Olivier Finkel (ELM)
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.LO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2011-07
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CC
math
math.LO

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Olivier Finkel
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack