Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > math > arXiv:1105.0321

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Mathematics > General Mathematics

arXiv:1105.0321 (math)
This paper has been withdrawn by Stephen Boyce
[Submitted on 2 May 2011 (v1), last revised 14 May 2025 (this version, v9)]

Title:Goedel's proof: a revisionist view

Authors:Stephen Boyce
View a PDF of the paper titled Goedel's proof: a revisionist view, by Stephen Boyce
No PDF available, click to view other formats
Abstract:This note presents a revised assessment of Goedel's proof. I show that the proof can be modified to establish that there exists a system P' such that: either P' is inconsistent (and P is also inconsistent) or P' is consistent and yet has no model. To define P' I firstly present a semantics for Goedel's P, and then define a theory P0 which is syntactically identical to P however the meaning of the type one variables differs in that for any interpretation of P0 these variables range over all and only the individuals assigned to the P0 numerals. P' is the theory obtained by adding the negation of a Goedel sentence for P0 to the proper axioms of P0.
Comments: The paper contains an error. It's not possible to correctly define a semantics for such systems in a type free metatheory
Subjects: General Mathematics (math.GM)
MSC classes: 03B25
Cite as: arXiv:1105.0321 [math.GM]
  (or arXiv:1105.0321v9 [math.GM] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1105.0321
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Stephen Boyce [view email]
[v1] Mon, 2 May 2011 13:30:56 UTC (5 KB)
[v2] Thu, 12 May 2011 10:58:35 UTC (4 KB)
[v3] Tue, 31 May 2011 11:17:27 UTC (7 KB)
[v4] Sun, 19 Jun 2011 12:21:50 UTC (8 KB)
[v5] Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:36:41 UTC (9 KB)
[v6] Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:09:04 UTC (4 KB)
[v7] Thu, 8 Sep 2011 13:50:51 UTC (9 KB)
[v8] Sun, 2 Oct 2011 22:43:24 UTC (6 KB)
[v9] Wed, 14 May 2025 02:36:03 UTC (1 KB) (withdrawn)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Goedel's proof: a revisionist view, by Stephen Boyce
  • Withdrawn
No license for this version due to withdrawn
Current browse context:
math.GM
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2011-05
Change to browse by:
math

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack