Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > gr-qc > arXiv:1008.4622

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

arXiv:1008.4622 (gr-qc)
[Submitted on 27 Aug 2010 (v1), last revised 24 Jan 2011 (this version, v2)]

Title:Conservative self-force correction to the innermost stable circular orbit: comparison with multiple post-Newtonian-based methods

Authors:Marc Favata
View a PDF of the paper titled Conservative self-force correction to the innermost stable circular orbit: comparison with multiple post-Newtonian-based methods, by Marc Favata
View PDF
Abstract:[abridged] Barack & Sago have recently computed the shift of the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO) due to the conservative self-force that arises from the finite-mass of an orbiting test-particle. This is one of the first concrete results of the self-force program, and provides an exact point of comparison with approximate post-Newtonian (PN) computations of the ISCO. Here this exact ISCO shift is compared with nearly all known PN-based methods. These include both "nonresummed" and "resummed" approaches (the latter reproduce the test-particle limit by construction). The best agreement with the exact result is found from effective-one-body (EOB) calculations that are fit to numerical relativity simulations. However, if one considers uncalibrated methods based only on the currently known 3PN-order conservative dynamics, the best agreement is found from the gauge-invariant ISCO condition of Blanchet and Iyer (2003). This method reproduces the exact test-particle limit without any resummation. A comparison of PN methods with the equal-mass ISCO is also performed. The results of this study suggest that the EOB approach---while exactly incorporating the conservative test-particle dynamics---does not (in the absence of calibration) incorporate conservative self-force effects more accurately than standard PN methods. I also consider how the conservative self-force ISCO shift, combined with numerical relativity computations of the ISCO, can be used to constrain our knowledge of (1) the EOB effective metric, (2) phenomenological inspiral-merger-ringdown templates, and (3) 4PN and 5PN order terms in the PN orbital energy. These constraints could help in constructing better gravitational-wave templates. Lastly, I suggest a new method to calibrate unknown PN-terms in inspiral templates using numerical-relativity calculations.
Comments: 27 pages, 2 figures, 2 tables. v2: some changes to Sec. VI in response to referee comments; references added; other minor changes to match published version
Subjects: General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc); High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena (astro-ph.HE)
Cite as: arXiv:1008.4622 [gr-qc]
  (or arXiv:1008.4622v2 [gr-qc] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1008.4622
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Phys.Rev.D83:024027,2011
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.024027
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Marc Favata [view email]
[v1] Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:10:31 UTC (184 KB)
[v2] Mon, 24 Jan 2011 05:52:53 UTC (187 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Conservative self-force correction to the innermost stable circular orbit: comparison with multiple post-Newtonian-based methods, by Marc Favata
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
gr-qc
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2010-08
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
astro-ph.HE

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack