Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1005.2135v1

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Computer Science and Game Theory

arXiv:1005.2135v1 (cs)
[Submitted on 12 May 2010 (this version), latest version 14 Apr 2011 (v5)]

Title:Two examples to break through classical theorems on Nash implementation with two agents

Authors:Haoyang Wu
View a PDF of the paper titled Two examples to break through classical theorems on Nash implementation with two agents, by Haoyang Wu
View PDF
Abstract:[E. Maskin, \emph{Rev. Econom. Stud.} \textbf{66} (1999) 23-38] is a seminal paper in the field of mechanism design and implementation theory. [J. Moore and R. Repullo, \emph{Econometrica} \textbf{58} (1990) 1083-1099] and [B. Dutta and A. Sen, \emph{Rev. Econom. Stud.} \textbf{58} (1991) 121-128] are two fundamental papers on two-player Nash implementation. Recently, [H. Wu, https://arxiv.boxedpaper.com/pdf/1004.5327v1 ] proposed a classical algorithm to break through Maskin's theorem for the case of many agents. In this paper, we will give two examples to break through the aforementioned results on two-agent Nash implementation by virtue of Wu's algorithm. There are two main contributions of this paper: 1) A two-player social choice rule (SCR) that satisfies Condition $\mu2$ cannot be Nash implemented if an additional Condition $\lambda'$ is satisfied. 2) A non-dictatorial two-player weakly pareto-optimal SCR is Nash implementable if Condition $\lambda'$ is satisfied. Although the former is negative for the economic society, the latter is just positive. Put in other words, some SCRs which are traditionally viewed as not be Nash implementable may be Nash implemented now.
Comments: 8 pages
Subjects: Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:1005.2135 [cs.GT]
  (or arXiv:1005.2135v1 [cs.GT] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1005.2135
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Haoyang Wu [view email]
[v1] Wed, 12 May 2010 15:41:02 UTC (14 KB)
[v2] Thu, 13 May 2010 14:41:18 UTC (732 KB)
[v3] Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:48:37 UTC (1,064 KB)
[v4] Sat, 2 Apr 2011 11:30:03 UTC (901 KB)
[v5] Thu, 14 Apr 2011 01:51:35 UTC (901 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Two examples to break through classical theorems on Nash implementation with two agents, by Haoyang Wu
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.GT
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2010-05
Change to browse by:
cs
physics
physics.soc-ph

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Haoyang Wu
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack