Title:Remarks on AriasMarco-Schüth's paper entitled: "Local symmetry of harmonic spaces as determined by the spectra of small geodesic spheres" [arXiv:1001.1611]

Abstract:In this note we point out the difficulties in the proof of the above theorem stated in the title of a recent paper [arXiv:1001.1611] of T. Arias-Marco and D. Schueth. It is announced there that this theorem contradicts some of the isospectrality examples this author constructed on geodesic balls and spheres of certain harmonic manifolds. It is pointed out below that, contrary to this statement, the local symmetry of a generic harmonic space can not be determined by the spectra of local geodesic balls and spheres. The problem in the AM-S-proof arises in the last step where an eliminating equation is introduced. This equation has no connection to the given spectral data whose application provides such spectrally undetermined relations which can rather be established by a non-spectral data. Thus, these computations do not deliver neither the above theorem nor the contradiction brought up against my isospectrality examples. I will describe also a strong physical argument which clearly explains why the manifolds appearing in my examples are isospectral. It should be pointed out that despite these problems a remarkable new idea is introduced in [AM-S]. Namely, the spectral data of geodesic spheres is furnished by asymptotic expansions of the heat invariants $a_k(p,r)$ defined on geodesic spheres, $S_p(r)$, of radius $r$ and center $p$. It seems to be an important tool for developing global vs. local spectral investigations. Among the contributions this paper offers to this developing field is the following statement: The average volumes, $\int vol(B_p(r))dp$ resp. $\int vol(S_p(r))dp$, of geodesic balls resp. spheres are generally not determined by the spectra of compact Riemann manifolds. This theorem interestingly contrasts Weil's asymptotic formula which determines the volume of the whole manifold in terms of the spectrum.