Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:0909.0529

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

arXiv:0909.0529 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 2 Sep 2009 (v1), last revised 12 Feb 2010 (this version, v2)]

Title:Optimal capture of non-Gaussianity in weak lensing surveys: power spectrum, bispectrum and halo counts

Authors:Joel Berge, Adam Amara, Alexandre Refregier
View a PDF of the paper titled Optimal capture of non-Gaussianity in weak lensing surveys: power spectrum, bispectrum and halo counts, by Joel Berge and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract: We compare the efficiency of weak lensing-selected galaxy clusters counts and of the weak lensing bispectrum at capturing non-Gaussian features in the dark matter distribution. We use the halo model to compute the weak lensing power spectrum, the bispectrum and the expected number of detected clusters, and derive constraints on cosmological parameters for a large, low systematic weak lensing survey, by focusing on the $\Omega_m$-$\sigma_8$ plane and on the dark energy equation of state. We separate the power spectrum into the resolved and the unresolved parts of the data, the resolved part being defined as detected clusters, and the unresolved part as the rest of the field. We consider four kinds of clusters counts, taking into account different amount of information : signal-to-noise ratio peak counts; counts as a function of clusters' mass; counts as a function of clusters' redshift; and counts as a function of clusters' mass and redshift. We show that when combined with the power spectrum, those four kinds of counts provide similar constraints, thus allowing one to perform the most direct counts, signal-to-noise peaks counts, and get percent level constraints on cosmological parameters. We show that the weak lensing bispectrum gives constraints comparable to those given by the power spectrum and captures non-Gaussian features as well as clusters counts, its combination with the power spectrum giving errors on cosmological parameters that are similar to, if not marginally smaller than, those obtained when combining the power spectrum with cluster counts. We finally note that in order to reach its potential, the weak lensing bispectrum must be computed using all triangle configurations, as equilateral triangles alone do not provide useful information.
Comments: Matches ApJ-accepted version
Subjects: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)
Cite as: arXiv:0909.0529 [astro-ph.CO]
  (or arXiv:0909.0529v2 [astro-ph.CO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0909.0529
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Astrophys.J.712:992-1002,2010
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/992
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Joel Bergé [view email]
[v1] Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:42:53 UTC (90 KB)
[v2] Fri, 12 Feb 2010 01:49:03 UTC (97 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Optimal capture of non-Gaussianity in weak lensing surveys: power spectrum, bispectrum and halo counts, by Joel Berge and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2009-09
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack