Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > stat > arXiv:0907.3166

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Statistics > Applications

arXiv:0907.3166 (stat)
[Submitted on 17 Jul 2009]

Title:Checking election outcome accuracy Post-election audit sampling

Authors:Kathy Dopp
View a PDF of the paper titled Checking election outcome accuracy Post-election audit sampling, by Kathy Dopp
View PDF
Abstract: This article
* provides an overview of post-election audit sampling research and compares various approaches to calculating post-election audit sample sizes, focusing on risklimiting audits,
* discusses fundamental concepts common to all risk-limiting post-election audits, presenting new margin error bounds, sampling weights and sampling probabilities that improve upon existing approaches and work for any size audit unit and for single or multi-winner election contests,
* provides two new simple formulas for estimating post-election audit sample sizes in cases when detailed data, expertise, or tools are not available,
* summarizes four improved methods for calculating risk-limiting election audit sample sizes, showing how to apply precise margin error bounds to improve the accuracy and efficacy of existing methods, and
* discusses sampling mistakes that reduce post-election audit effectiveness.
Comments: 37 pages + 19 pages of appendices & references, 3 figures, 10 tables
Subjects: Applications (stat.AP); Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:0907.3166 [stat.AP]
  (or arXiv:0907.3166v1 [stat.AP] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0907.3166
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Kathy Dopp [view email]
[v1] Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:55:49 UTC (80 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Checking election outcome accuracy Post-election audit sampling, by Kathy Dopp
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
stat.AP
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2009-07
Change to browse by:
stat
stat.ME

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack