Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > gr-qc > arXiv:0907.0700

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

arXiv:0907.0700 (gr-qc)
[Submitted on 3 Jul 2009]

Title:Comparison of post-Newtonian templates for compact binary inspiral signals in gravitational-wave detectors

Authors:Alessandra Buonanno, Bala Iyer, Evan Ochsner, Yi Pan, B.S. Sathyaprakash
View a PDF of the paper titled Comparison of post-Newtonian templates for compact binary inspiral signals in gravitational-wave detectors, by Alessandra Buonanno and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract: The two-body dynamics in general relativity has been solved perturbatively using the post-Newtonian (PN) approximation. The evolution of the orbital phase and the emitted gravitational radiation are now known to a rather high order up to O(v^8), v being the characteristic velocity of the binary. The orbital evolution, however, cannot be specified uniquely due to the inherent freedom in the choice of parameter used in the PN expansion as well as the method pursued in solving the relevant differential equations. The goal of this paper is to determine the (dis)agreement between different PN waveform families in the context of initial and advanced gravitational-wave detectors. The waveforms employed in our analysis are those that are currently used by Initial LIGO/Virgo, that is the time-domain PN models TaylorT1, TaylorT2, TaylorT3, TaylorT4 and TaylorEt, the effective one-body (EOB) model, and the Fourier-domain representation TaylorF2. We examine the overlaps of these models with one another and with the prototype effective one-body model (calibrated to numerical relativity simulations, as currently used by initial LIGO) for a number of different binaries at 2PN, 3PN and 3.5PN orders to quantify their differences and to help us decide whether there exist preferred families that are the most appropriate as search templates. We conclude that as long as the total mass remains less than a certain upper limit M_crit, all template families at 3.5PN order (except TaylorT3 and TaylorEt) are equally good for the purpose of detection. The value of M_crit is found to be ~ 12M_Sun for Initial, Enhanced and Advanced LIGO. From a purely computational point of view we recommend that 3.5PN TaylorF2 be used below Mcrit and EOB calibrated to numerical relativity simulations be used for total binary mass M > Mcrit.
Comments: 27 pages, 8 figures, 4 tables, submitted to PRD
Subjects: General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc)
Cite as: arXiv:0907.0700 [gr-qc]
  (or arXiv:0907.0700v1 [gr-qc] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0907.0700
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Phys.Rev.D80:084043,2009
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.80.084043
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Evan Ochsner [view email]
[v1] Fri, 3 Jul 2009 19:31:53 UTC (680 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Comparison of post-Newtonian templates for compact binary inspiral signals in gravitational-wave detectors, by Alessandra Buonanno and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
gr-qc
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2009-07

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack