Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > physics > arXiv:0903.1072v2

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Physics > Physics and Society

arXiv:0903.1072v2 (physics)
[Submitted on 5 Mar 2009 (v1), last revised 7 Oct 2009 (this version, v2)]

Title:Tolerating the Community Detection Resolution Limit with Edge Weighting

Authors:Jonathan W. Berry, Bruce Hendrickson, Randall A. LaViolette, Cynthia A. Phillips
View a PDF of the paper titled Tolerating the Community Detection Resolution Limit with Edge Weighting, by Jonathan W. Berry and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract: Communities of vertices within a giant network such as the World-Wide Web are likely to be vastly smaller than the network itself. However, Fortunato and Barthélemy have proved that modularity maximization algorithms for community detection may fail to resolve communities with fewer than $\sqrt{L/2}$ edges, where $L$ is the number of edges in the entire network. This resolution limit leads modularity maximization algorithms to have notoriously poor accuracy on many real networks. Fortunato and Barthélemy's argument can be extended to networks with weighted edges as well, and we derive this corollary argument. We conclude that weighted modularity algorithms may fail to resolve communities with fewer than $\sqrt{W \epsilon/2}$ total edge weight, where $W$ is the total edge weight in the network and $\epsilon$ is the maximum weight of an inter-community edge. If $\epsilon$ is small, then small communities can be resolved.
Given a weighted or unweighted network, we describe how to derive new edge weights in order to achieve a low $\epsilon$, we modify the ``CNM'' community detection algorithm to maximize weighted modularity, and show that the resulting algorithm has greatly improved accuracy. In experiments with an emerging community standard benchmark, we find that our simple CNM variant is competitive with the most accurate community detection methods yet proposed.
Comments: revision with 8 pages 3 figures 2 tables
Subjects: Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph); Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability (physics.data-an)
Cite as: arXiv:0903.1072 [physics.soc-ph]
  (or arXiv:0903.1072v2 [physics.soc-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0903.1072
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.83.056119
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Randall LaViolette [view email]
[v1] Thu, 5 Mar 2009 19:31:14 UTC (235 KB)
[v2] Wed, 7 Oct 2009 21:59:00 UTC (202 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Tolerating the Community Detection Resolution Limit with Edge Weighting, by Jonathan W. Berry and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
physics.soc-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2009-03
Change to browse by:
physics
physics.data-an

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack