Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:0806.0374

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics

arXiv:0806.0374 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 3 Jun 2008 (v1), last revised 8 Jul 2008 (this version, v3)]

Title:The Nature of UCDs: Internal Dynamics from an Expanded Sample and Homogeneous Database

Authors:Steffen Mieske, Michael Hilker, Andres Jordan, Leopoldo Infante, Markus Kissler-Patig, Marina Rejkuba, Tom Richtler, Patrick Cote, Holger Baumgardt, Michael J. West, Laura Ferrarese, Eric W. Peng
View a PDF of the paper titled The Nature of UCDs: Internal Dynamics from an Expanded Sample and Homogeneous Database, by Steffen Mieske and 11 other authors
View PDF
Abstract: We have obtained high-resolution spectra of 23 ultra-compact dwarf galaxies (UCDs) in the Fornax cluster with -10.4>M_V>-13.5 mag (10^6<M/M_*<10^8), using FLAMES/Giraffe at the VLT. This is the largest homogeneous data set of UCD internal dynamics assembled to date. We derive dynamical M/L ratios for 15 UCDs covered by HST imaging. In the M_V-sigma plane, UCDs with M_V<-12 mag are consistent with the extrapolated Faber-Jackson relation for luminous ellipticals, while fainter UCDs are closer to the extrapolated globular cluster (GC) relation. At a given metallicity, Fornax UCDs have on average 30-40% lower M/L ratios than Virgo UCDs, suggesting possible differences in age or dark matter content between Fornax and Virgo UCDs. For our sample of Fornax UCDs we find no significant correlation between M/L ratio and mass. We combine our data with available M/L ratio measurements of compact stellar systems with 10^4<M/M_*<10^8, and normalise all M/L estimates to solar metallicity. We find that UCDs (M > 2*10^6 M_*) have M/L ratios twice as large as GCs (M < 2*10^6 M_*). We show that stellar population models tend to under-predict dynamical M/L ratios of UCDs and over-predict those of GCs. Considering the scaling relations of stellar spheroids, UCDs align well along the 'Fundamental Manifold', constituting the small-scale end of the galaxy sequence. The alignment for UCDs is especially clear for r_e >~ 7 pc, which corresponds to dynamical relaxation times that exceed a Hubble time. In contrast, GCs exhibit a broader scatter and do not appear to align along the manifold. We argue that UCDs are the smallest dynamically un-relaxed stellar systems, with M > 2*10^6 M_* and 7<r_e<100 pc. Future studies should aim at explaining the elevated M/L ratios of UCDs and the environmental dependence of their properties.
Comments: 17 pages, 14 figures, accepted for publication in A&A. V3 taking into account proof corrections: Table 3 radial velocity entries corrected by heliocentric correction, updated sigma entries in Table 5 for a few CenA sources, updated references for G1 and omega Cen
Subjects: Astrophysics (astro-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:0806.0374 [astro-ph]
  (or arXiv:0806.0374v3 [astro-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0806.0374
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361%3A200810077
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Steffen Mieske [view email]
[v1] Tue, 3 Jun 2008 08:01:09 UTC (359 KB)
[v2] Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:38:56 UTC (359 KB)
[v3] Tue, 8 Jul 2008 13:26:50 UTC (359 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled The Nature of UCDs: Internal Dynamics from an Expanded Sample and Homogeneous Database, by Steffen Mieske and 11 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2008-06

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack