Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > stat > arXiv:0708.4350

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Statistics > Applications

arXiv:0708.4350 (stat)
[Submitted on 31 Aug 2007]

Title:Random-set methods identify distinct aspects of the enrichment signal in gene-set analysis

Authors:Michael A. Newton, Fernando A. Quintana, Johan A. den Boon, Srikumar Sengupta, Paul Ahlquist
View a PDF of the paper titled Random-set methods identify distinct aspects of the enrichment signal in gene-set analysis, by Michael A. Newton and 4 other authors
View PDF
Abstract: A prespecified set of genes may be enriched, to varying degrees, for genes that have altered expression levels relative to two or more states of a cell. Knowing the enrichment of gene sets defined by functional categories, such as gene ontology (GO) annotations, is valuable for analyzing the biological signals in microarray expression data. A common approach to measuring enrichment is by cross-classifying genes according to membership in a functional category and membership on a selected list of significantly altered genes. A small Fisher's exact test $p$-value, for example, in this $2\times2$ table is indicative of enrichment. Other category analysis methods retain the quantitative gene-level scores and measure significance by referring a category-level statistic to a permutation distribution associated with the original differential expression problem. We describe a class of random-set scoring methods that measure distinct components of the enrichment signal. The class includes Fisher's test based on selected genes and also tests that average gene-level evidence across the category. Averaging and selection methods are compared empirically using Affymetrix data on expression in nasopharyngeal cancer tissue, and theoretically using a location model of differential expression. We find that each method has a domain of superiority in the state space of enrichment problems, and that both methods have benefits in practice. Our analysis also addresses two problems related to multiple-category inference, namely, that equally enriched categories are not detected with equal probability if they are of different sizes, and also that there is dependence among category statistics owing to shared genes. Random-set enrichment calculations do not require Monte Carlo for implementation. They are made available in the R package allez.
Comments: Published at this http URL in the Annals of Applied Statistics (this http URL) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (this http URL)
Subjects: Applications (stat.AP)
Report number: IMS-AOAS-AOAS104
Cite as: arXiv:0708.4350 [stat.AP]
  (or arXiv:0708.4350v1 [stat.AP] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0708.4350
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Annals of Applied Statistics 2007, Vol. 1, No. 1, 85-106
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/07-AOAS104
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Michael A. Newton [view email] [via VTEX proxy]
[v1] Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:08:51 UTC (443 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Random-set methods identify distinct aspects of the enrichment signal in gene-set analysis, by Michael A. Newton and 4 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
stat.AP
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2007-08
Change to browse by:
stat

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack