Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > hep-ph > arXiv:0705.4070

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

arXiv:0705.4070 (hep-ph)
[Submitted on 28 May 2007 (v1), last revised 22 Oct 2007 (this version, v2)]

Title:SNO+: predictions from standard solar models and spin flavour precession

Authors:Marco Picariello, João Pulido, S. Andringa, N.F. Barros, J. Maneira
View a PDF of the paper titled SNO+: predictions from standard solar models and spin flavour precession, by Marco Picariello and 4 other authors
View PDF
Abstract: Time variability of the solar neutrino flux especially in the low and intermediate energy sector remains an open question and, if it exists, it is likely to be originated from the magnetic moment transition from active to light sterile neutrinos at times of intense solar activity and magnetic field. We examine the prospects for the SNO+ experiment to address this important issue and to distinguish between the two classes of solar models which are currently identified as corresponding to a high (SSM I) and a low (SSM II) heavy element abundance. We also evaluate the predictions from these two models for the Chlorine experiment event rate in the standard LMA and LMA+Spin Flavour Precession (SFP) scenarios. It is found that after three years of SNO+ data taking, the pep flux measurement will be able to discriminate between the standard LMA and LMA+SFP scenarios, independently of which is the correct solar model. If the LMA rate is measured, SFP with $B_0 \sim 280kG$ for the resonant $\Delta m^2_{01}$ can be excluded at more than $4\sigma$. A low rate would signal new physics, excluding all the 90% allowed range of the standard LMA solution at 3$\sigma$, and a time variability would be a strong signature of the SFP model. The CNO fluxes are the ones for which the two SSM predictions exhibit the largest differences, so their measurement at SNO+ will be important to favour one or the other. The distinction will be clearer after LMA or SFP are confirmed with pep, but still, a CNO measurement at the level of SSM I/LMA will disfavour SSM II at about $3 \sigma$. We conclude that consistency between future pep and CNO flux measurements at SNO+ and Chlorine would either favour an LMA+SFP scenario or favour SSM II over SSM I.
Comments: 20 pages. Sections 1 and 2 extended, section 4.4 added, references added and updated. Final version to be published in JHEP
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:0705.4070 [hep-ph]
  (or arXiv:0705.4070v2 [hep-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0705.4070
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: JHEP0711:055,2007
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/055
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Joao Pulido [view email]
[v1] Mon, 28 May 2007 17:49:28 UTC (116 KB)
[v2] Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:14:00 UTC (119 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled SNO+: predictions from standard solar models and spin flavour precession, by Marco Picariello and 4 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
hep-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2007-05

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack