Skip to main content

Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Venkitasubramaniam, P

Searching in archive stat. Search in all archives.
.
  1. arXiv:2502.12086  [pdf, ps, other

    cs.LG stat.ML

    Unifying Explainable Anomaly Detection and Root Cause Analysis in Dynamical Systems

    Authors: Yue Sun, Rick S. Blum, Parv Venkitasubramaniam

    Abstract: Dynamical systems, prevalent in various scientific and engineering domains, are susceptible to anomalies that can significantly impact their performance and reliability. This paper addresses the critical challenges of anomaly detection, root cause localization, and anomaly type classification in dynamical systems governed by ordinary differential equations (ODEs). We define two categories of anoma… ▽ More

    Submitted 7 July, 2025; v1 submitted 17 February, 2025; originally announced February 2025.

    Comments: Accepted by the AAAI-25 Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Cyber Security (AICS)

  2. arXiv:2501.13430  [pdf, other

    cs.LG stat.ML

    Wasserstein-regularized Conformal Prediction under General Distribution Shift

    Authors: Rui Xu, Chao Chen, Yue Sun, Parvathinathan Venkitasubramaniam, Sihong Xie

    Abstract: Conformal prediction yields a prediction set with guaranteed $1-α$ coverage of the true target under the i.i.d. assumption, which may not hold and lead to a gap between $1-α$ and the actual coverage. Prior studies bound the gap using total variation distance, which cannot identify the gap changes under distribution shift at a given $α$. Besides, existing methods are mostly limited to covariate shi… ▽ More

    Submitted 6 March, 2025; v1 submitted 23 January, 2025; originally announced January 2025.

  3. arXiv:2403.15025  [pdf, other

    cs.LG stat.ML

    Robust Conformal Prediction under Distribution Shift via Physics-Informed Structural Causal Model

    Authors: Rui Xu, Yue Sun, Chao Chen, Parv Venkitasubramaniam, Sihong Xie

    Abstract: Uncertainty is critical to reliable decision-making with machine learning. Conformal prediction (CP) handles uncertainty by predicting a set on a test input, hoping the set to cover the true label with at least $(1-α)$ confidence. This coverage can be guaranteed on test data even if the marginal distributions $P_X$ differ between calibration and test datasets. However, as it is common in practice,… ▽ More

    Submitted 22 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.