A network psychometric analysis of maths anxiety factors in Italian psychology students
Authors:
Emma Franchino,
Luciana Ciringione,
Luisa Canal,
Ottavia Marina Epifania,
Luigi Lombardi,
Gianluca Lattanzi,
Massimo Stella
Abstract:
Dealing with mathematics can induce significant anxiety, strongly affecting psychology students' academic performance and career prospects. This phenomenon is known as maths anxiety and several scales can measure it. Most scales were created in English and abbreviated versions were translated and validated among Italian populations (e.g. Abbreviated Maths Anxiety Scale). This study translated the…
▽ More
Dealing with mathematics can induce significant anxiety, strongly affecting psychology students' academic performance and career prospects. This phenomenon is known as maths anxiety and several scales can measure it. Most scales were created in English and abbreviated versions were translated and validated among Italian populations (e.g. Abbreviated Maths Anxiety Scale). This study translated the 3-factor MAS-UK scale in Italian to produce a new tool, MAS-IT, validated specifically in a sample of Italian undergraduates enrolled in psychology or related BSc programmes. A sample of 324 Italian undergraduates completed the MAS-IT. The data were analysed using confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), testing the original MAS-UK 3-factor model. CFA results revealed that the original MAS-UK 3-factor model did not fit the Italian data. A subsequent Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA) identified 4 distinct components/factors of maths anxiety detected by MAS-IT. The items relative to "Passive Observation maths anxiety" factor remained stable across the analyses, whereas "Evaluation maths anxiety" and "Everyday/Social maths anxiety" items showed a reduced or poor item stability. Quantitative findings indicated potential cultural or contextual differences in the expression of maths anxiety in today's psychology undergraduates, underlining the need for more appropriate tools to be used among psychology students.
△ Less
Submitted 3 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
An information-theoretic approach to hypergraph psychometrics
Authors:
Daniele Marinazzo,
Jan Van Roozendaal,
Fernando E. Rosas,
Massimo Stella,
Renzo Comolatti,
Nigel Colenbier,
Sebastiano Stramaglia,
Yves Rosseel
Abstract:
Psychological network approaches propose to see symptoms or questionnaire items as interconnected nodes, with links between them reflecting pairwise statistical dependencies evaluated cross-sectional, time-series, or panel data. These networks constitute an established methodology to assess the interactions and relative importance of nodes/indicators, providing an important complement to other app…
▽ More
Psychological network approaches propose to see symptoms or questionnaire items as interconnected nodes, with links between them reflecting pairwise statistical dependencies evaluated cross-sectional, time-series, or panel data. These networks constitute an established methodology to assess the interactions and relative importance of nodes/indicators, providing an important complement to other approaches such as factor analysis. However, focusing the modelling solely on pairwise relationships can neglect potentially critical information shared by groups of three or more variables in the form of higher-order interdependencies. To overcome this important limitation, here we propose an information-theoretic framework based on hypergraphs as psychometric models. As edges in hypergraphs are capable of encompassing several nodes together, this extension can thus provide a richer representation of the interactions that may exist among sets of psychological variables. Our results show how psychometric hypergraphs can highlight meaningful redundant and synergistic interactions on either simulated or state-of-art, re-analyzed psychometric datasets. Overall, our framework extends current network approaches while leading to new ways of assessing the data that differ at their core from other methods, extending the psychometric toolbox and opening promising avenues for future investigation.
△ Less
Submitted 13 May, 2022; v1 submitted 2 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
