-
Monitoring Adverse Events Through Bayesian Nonparametric Clustering Across Studies
Authors:
Shijie Yuan,
Kevin Roberts,
Noirrit Kiran Chandra,
Yuan Ji,
Peter Müller
Abstract:
We introduce a Bayesian nonparametric inference approach for aggregate adverse event (AE) monitoring across studies. The proposed model seamlessly integrates external data from historical trials to define a relevant background rate and accommodates varying levels of covariate granularity (ranging from patient-level details to study-level aggregated summary data). Inference is based on a covariate-…
▽ More
We introduce a Bayesian nonparametric inference approach for aggregate adverse event (AE) monitoring across studies. The proposed model seamlessly integrates external data from historical trials to define a relevant background rate and accommodates varying levels of covariate granularity (ranging from patient-level details to study-level aggregated summary data). Inference is based on a covariate-dependent product partition model (PPMx). A central element of the model is the ability to group experimental units with similar profiles. We introduce a pairwise similarity measure, with which we set up a random partition of experimental units with comparable covariate profiles, thereby improving the precision of AE rate estimation. Importantly, the proposed framework supports real-time safety monitoring under blinding with a seamless transition to unblinded analyses when indicated. Using one case study and simulation studies, we demonstrate the model's ability to detect safety signals and assess risk under diverse trial scenarios.
△ Less
Submitted 8 September, 2025;
originally announced September 2025.
-
What's the Weight? Estimating Controlled Outcome Differences in Complex Surveys for Health Disparities Research
Authors:
Stephen Salerno,
Emily K. Roberts,
Belinda L. Needham,
Tyler H. McCormick,
Fan Li,
Bhramar Mukherjee,
Xu Shi
Abstract:
In this work, we are motivated by the problem of estimating racial disparities in health outcomes, specifically the average controlled difference (ACD) in telomere length between Black and White individuals, using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). To do so, we build a propensity for race to properly adjust for other social determinants while characterizing th…
▽ More
In this work, we are motivated by the problem of estimating racial disparities in health outcomes, specifically the average controlled difference (ACD) in telomere length between Black and White individuals, using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). To do so, we build a propensity for race to properly adjust for other social determinants while characterizing the controlled effect of race on telomere length. Propensity score methods are broadly employed with observational data as a tool to achieve covariate balance, but how to implement them in complex surveys is less studied - in particular, when the survey weights depend on the group variable under comparison (as the NHANES sampling scheme depends on self-reported race). We propose identification formulas to properly estimate the ACD in outcomes between Black and White individuals, with appropriate weighting for both covariate imbalance across the two racial groups and generalizability. Via extensive simulation, we show that our proposed methods outperform traditional analytic approaches in terms of bias, mean squared error, and coverage when estimating the ACD for our setting of interest. In our data, we find that evidence of racial differences in telomere length between Black and White individuals attenuates after accounting for confounding by socioeconomic factors and utilizing appropriate propensity score and survey weighting techniques. Software to implement these methods and code to reproduce our results can be found in the R package svycdiff, available through the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) at cran.r-project.org/web/packages/svycdiff/, or in a development version on GitHub at github.com/salernos/svycdiff.
△ Less
Submitted 16 September, 2025; v1 submitted 27 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Surrogacy Validation for Time-to-Event Outcomes with Illness-Death Frailty Models
Authors:
Emily K. Roberts,
Michael R. Elliott,
Jeremy M. G. Taylor
Abstract:
A common practice in clinical trials is to evaluate a treatment effect on an intermediate endpoint when the true outcome of interest would be difficult or costly to measure. We consider how to validate intermediate endpoints in a causally-valid way when the trial outcomes are time-to-event. Using counterfactual outcomes, those that would be observed if the counterfactual treatment had been given,…
▽ More
A common practice in clinical trials is to evaluate a treatment effect on an intermediate endpoint when the true outcome of interest would be difficult or costly to measure. We consider how to validate intermediate endpoints in a causally-valid way when the trial outcomes are time-to-event. Using counterfactual outcomes, those that would be observed if the counterfactual treatment had been given, the causal association paradigm assesses the relationship of the treatment effect on the surrogate $S$ with the treatment effect on the true endpoint $T$. In particular, we propose illness death models to accommodate the censored and semi-competing risk structure of survival data. The proposed causal version of these models involves estimable and counterfactual frailty terms. Via these multi-state models, we characterize what a valid surrogate would look like using a causal effect predictiveness plot. We evaluate the estimation properties of a Bayesian method using Markov Chain Monte Carlo and assess the sensitivity of our model assumptions. Our motivating data source is a localized prostate cancer clinical trial where the two survival endpoints are time to distant metastasis and time to death.
△ Less
Submitted 28 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
