Cast vote records: A database of ballots from the 2020 U.S. Election
Authors:
Shiro Kuriwaki,
Mason Reece,
Samuel Baltz,
Aleksandra Conevska,
Joseph R. Loffredo,
Can Mutlu,
Taran Samarth,
Kevin E. Acevedo Jetter,
Zachary Djanogly Garai,
Kate Murray,
Shigeo Hirano,
Jeffrey B. Lewis,
James M. Snyder Jr.,
Charles H. Stewart III
Abstract:
Ballots are the core records of elections. Electronic records of actual ballots cast (cast vote records) are available to the public in some jurisdictions. However, they have been released in a variety of formats and have not been independently evaluated. Here we introduce a database of cast vote records from the 2020 U.S. general election. We downloaded publicly available unstandardized cast vote…
▽ More
Ballots are the core records of elections. Electronic records of actual ballots cast (cast vote records) are available to the public in some jurisdictions. However, they have been released in a variety of formats and have not been independently evaluated. Here we introduce a database of cast vote records from the 2020 U.S. general election. We downloaded publicly available unstandardized cast vote records, standardized them into a multi-state database, and extensively compared their totals to certified election results. Our release includes vote records for President, Governor, U.S. Senate and House, and state upper and lower chambers -- covering 42.7 million voters in 20 states who voted for more than 2,204 candidates. This database serves as a uniquely granular administrative dataset for studying voting behavior and election administration. Using this data, we show that in battleground states, 1.9 percent of solid Republicans (as defined by their congressional and state legislative voting) in our database split their ticket for Joe Biden, while 1.2 percent of solid Democrats split their ticket for Donald Trump.
△ Less
Submitted 24 October, 2024;
originally announced November 2024.
Opening the black box of neural nets: case studies in stop/top discrimination
Authors:
Thomas Roxlo,
Matthew Reece
Abstract:
We introduce techniques for exploring the functionality of a neural network and extracting simple, human-readable approximations to its performance. By performing gradient ascent on the input space of the network, we are able to produce large populations of artificial events which strongly excite a given classifier. By studying the populations of these events, we then directly produce what are ess…
▽ More
We introduce techniques for exploring the functionality of a neural network and extracting simple, human-readable approximations to its performance. By performing gradient ascent on the input space of the network, we are able to produce large populations of artificial events which strongly excite a given classifier. By studying the populations of these events, we then directly produce what are essentially contour maps of the network's classification function. Combined with a suite of tools for identifying the input dimensions deemed most important by the network, we can utilize these maps to efficiently interpret the dominant criteria by which the network makes its classification.
As a test case, we study networks trained to discriminate supersymmetric stop production in the dilepton channel from Standard Model backgrounds. In the case of a heavy stop decaying to a light neutralino, we find individual neurons with large mutual information with $m_{T2}^{\ell\ell}$, a human-designed variable for optimizing the analysis. The network selects events with significant missing $p_T$ oriented azimuthally away from both leptons, efficiently rejecting $t\overline{t}$ background. In the case of a light stop with three-body decays to $Wb{\widetilde χ}$ and little phase space, we find neurons that smoothly interpolate between a similar top-rejection strategy and an ISR-tagging strategy allowing for more missing momentum. We also find that a neural network trained on a stealth stop parameter point learns novel angular correlations.
△ Less
Submitted 24 April, 2018;
originally announced April 2018.
